378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26361205)
1. Embryo selection versus natural selection: how do outcomes of comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts compare with the analysis of products of conception from early pregnancy loss (dilation and curettage) among an assisted reproductive technology population?
Rodriguez-Purata J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Moschini RM; Knopman J; Duke M; Sandler B; Copperman A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1460-66.e1-12. PubMed ID: 26361205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?
Kang HJ; Melnick AP; Stewart JD; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 27143516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012.
Kushnir VA; Darmon SK; Albertini DF; Barad DH; Gleicher N
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 26952783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.
Scott RT; Upham KM; Forman EJ; Hong KH; Scott KL; Taylor D; Tao X; Treff NR
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 23731996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.
Maxwell SM; Colls P; Hodes-Wertz B; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Wells D; Munné S; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1414-1419.e5. PubMed ID: 27692437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.
Friedenthal J; Maxwell SM; Munné S; Kramer Y; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 29605407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variations in chromosomal aneuploidy rates in IVF blastocysts and early spontaneous abortion chorionic villi.
Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhao N; Liu P; Huang J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Mar; 37(3):527-537. PubMed ID: 31903515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy.
Balakier H; Sojecki A; Motamedi G; Librach C
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):608-614.e2. PubMed ID: 27206619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Irani M; Reichman D; Robles A; Melnick A; Davis O; Zaninovic N; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):664-670. PubMed ID: 28069172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.
Chang J; Boulet SL; Jeng G; Flowers L; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 26551441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between chromosomal distribution and embryonic findings on ultrasound in early pregnancy loss after IVF-embryo transfer.
Ouyang Y; Tan Y; Yi Y; Gong F; Lin G; Li X; Lu G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2212-8. PubMed ID: 27614356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.
Coates A; Kung A; Mounts E; Hesla J; Bankowski B; Barbieri E; Ata B; Cohen J; Munné S
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):723-730.e3. PubMed ID: 28139240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis.
Dahdouh EM; Balayla J; García-Velasco JA
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 26385405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos from couples with a previous aneuploid miscarriage.
Al-Asmar N; Peinado V; Vera M; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Simón C; Hassold T; Rubio C
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 22521156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening.
Jing S; Luo K; He H; Lu C; Zhang S; Tan Y; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):105-112.e4. PubMed ID: 27005274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.
Capalbo A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Biricik A; Baldi M; Colamaria S; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Fiorentino F
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 23148203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes.
Neal SA; Franasiak JM; Forman EJ; Werner MD; Morin SJ; Tao X; Treff NR; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):731-736.e1. PubMed ID: 27939761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media.
Shamonki MI; Jin H; Haimowitz Z; Liu L
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1312-1318. PubMed ID: 27565258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments.
Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Biricik A; Bono S; Ruberti A; Cotroneo E; Baldi M; Cursio E; Minasi MG; Greco E
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jan; 109(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 29191449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
