BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26361271)

  • 1. Concentration measurement of yeast suspensions using high frequency ultrasound backscattering.
    Elvira L; Vera P; Cañadas FJ; Shukla SK; Montero F
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Jan; 64():151-61. PubMed ID: 26361271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein release from yeast cells as an evaluation method of physical effects in ultrasonic field.
    Iida Y; Tuziuti T; Yasui K; Kozuka T; Towata A
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2008 Sep; 15(6):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18424218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell viability and proteins release during ultrasound-assisted yeast lysis of light lees in model wine.
    García Martín JF; Guillemet L; Feng C; Sun DW
    Food Chem; 2013 Nov; 141(2):934-9. PubMed ID: 23790870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic measurement of condensate film thickness.
    Kimball JT; Bailey MR; Hermanson JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 19062786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Backscattering measurement from a single microdroplet.
    Lee J; Chang JH; Jeong JS; Lee C; Teh SY; Lee A; Shung KK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):874-9. PubMed ID: 21507767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High frequency ultrasonic backscatter from erythrocyte suspension.
    Kuo IY; Shung KK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jan; 41(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8200665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative analysis of temperature dependent acoustic trapping characteristics by using concentric annular type dual element ultrasonic transducer.
    Chung IY; Lee J
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():220-6. PubMed ID: 25106111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of mechanical properties of materials using ultrasound broadband spectroscopy.
    Agrawal M; Prasad A; Bellare JR; Seshia AA
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Jan; 64():186-95. PubMed ID: 26387979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An adaptive threshold filter for ultrasound signal rejection.
    Tsui PH; Chang CC; Chang CC; Huang NE; Ho MC
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):413-8. PubMed ID: 19056100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental validation of a time domain simulation of high frequency ultrasonic propagation in a suspension of rigid particles.
    Galaz B; Haïat G; Berti R; Taulier N; Amman JJ; Urbach W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 20058958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal denoising and ultrasonic flaw detection via overcomplete and sparse representations.
    Zhang GM; Harvey DM; Braden DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 19045784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic scattering from double-diffusive microstructure.
    Lavery AC; Ross T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1449. PubMed ID: 17927406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic manipulation of particles and cells. Ultrasonic separation of cells.
    Coakley WT; Whitworth G; Grundy MA; Gould RK; Allman R
    Bioseparation; 1994 Apr; 4(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 7765041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viability of yeast cells in well controlled propagating and standing ultrasonic plane waves.
    Radel S; McLoughlin AJ; Gherardini L; Doblhoff-Dier O; Benes E
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):633-7. PubMed ID: 10829741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of stochastic and effective medium approaches to the backscattered signal from a porous layer in a solid matrix.
    Pinfield VJ; Challis RE; Smith RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 21786883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct methods for characterizing high-intensity focused ultrasound transducers using acoustic streaming.
    Myers MR; Hariharan P; Banerjee RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1790-802. PubMed ID: 19045669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Density, ultrasound velocity, acoustic impedance, reflection and absorption coefficient determination of liquids via multiple reflection method.
    Hoche S; Hussein MA; Becker T
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Mar; 57():65-71. PubMed ID: 25465962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulse compression in a time variant system with application to ultrasonic vibrometry.
    Martin JS; Rogers PH; Gray MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1503-14. PubMed ID: 23464021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling the influence of slurry concentration on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cake porosity and resistance during microfiltration.
    Mota M; Flickinger MC
    Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 23011664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.