BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26361353)

  • 1. Delays in Admittance-Controlled Haptic Devices Make Simulated Masses Feel Heavier.
    Kuling IA; Smeets JB; Lammertse P; Onneweer B; Mugge W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138023. PubMed ID: 26361353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Customization, control, and characterization of a commercial haptic device for high-fidelity rendering of weak forces.
    Gurari N; Baud-Bovy G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Sep; 235():169-80. PubMed ID: 25043509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A force-controlled planar haptic device for movement control analysis of the human arm.
    de Vlugt E; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Teerhuis PC; Brouwn GG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Oct; 129(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 14511818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and Psychophysical Evaluation of the HapSticks: A Novel Non-Grounded Mechanism for Presenting Tool-Mediated Vertical Forces.
    Kato G; Kuroda Y; Nisky I; Kiyokawa K; Takemura H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(3):338-349. PubMed ID: 27992349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unimanual and bimanual weight perception of virtual objects with a new multi-finger haptic interface.
    Giachritsis CD; Ferre M; Barrio J; Wing AM
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Jun; 85(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 21600271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.
    Di Luca M; Knörlein B; Ernst MO; Harders M
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Jun; 85(5):245-59. PubMed ID: 20193747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coordination between digit forces and positions: interactions between anticipatory and feedback control.
    Fu Q; Santello M
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 111(7):1519-28. PubMed ID: 24401711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haptic perception of gravitational and inertial mass.
    Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1144-54. PubMed ID: 20436207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception-based 3D tactile rendering from a single image for human skin examinations by dynamic touch.
    Kim K; Lee S
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25087469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Providing haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a direct optical force-sensing solution for haptic rendering of deformable bodies.
    Ehrampoosh S; Dave M; Kia MA; Rablau C; Zadeh MH
    Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(5-6):129-41. PubMed ID: 24156342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring neuromuscular control dynamics during car following with continuous haptic feedback.
    Abbink DA; Mulder M; van der Helm FC; Mulder M; Boer ER
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2011 Oct; 41(5):1239-49. PubMed ID: 21536522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anisotropy in the haptic perception of force direction and magnitude.
    van Beek FE; Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 24808392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of a torque-controlled manipulator to analyse the admittance of the wrist joint.
    Schouten AC; de Vlugt E; van Hilten JJ; van der Helm FC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jun; 154(1-2):134-41. PubMed ID: 16434105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hand-tool-tissue interaction forces in neurosurgery for haptic rendering.
    Aggravi M; De Momi E; DiMeco F; Cardinale F; Casaceli G; Riva M; Ferrigno G; Prattichizzo D
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1229-41. PubMed ID: 26718558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haptic characterization of human skin in vivo in response to shower gels using a magnetic levitation device.
    Yardley R; Fan A; Masters J; Mascaro S
    Skin Res Technol; 2016 Feb; 22(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 26037842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device.
    Wu B; Klatzky R; Lee R; Shivaprabhu V; Galeotti J; Siegel M; Schuman JS; Hollis R; Stetten G
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):523-37. PubMed ID: 25875439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception.
    Perreault JO; Cao CG
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):574-86. PubMed ID: 17063970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human detection and discrimination of tactile repeatability, mechanical backlash, and temporal delay in a combined tactile-kinesthetic haptic display system.
    Doxon AJ; Johnson DE; Tan HZ; Provancher WR
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 24808397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics modeling for parallel haptic interfaces with force sensing and control.
    Bernstein N; Lawrence D; Pao L
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(4):429-39. PubMed ID: 24808395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heaviness perception. I. Constant involvement of haptically perceived size in weight discrimination.
    Kawai S
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 12373364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.