These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26361557)

  • 1. Predicting the outcome of competition when fitness inequality is variable.
    Pedruski MT; Fussmann GF; Gonzalez A
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Aug; 2(8):150274. PubMed ID: 26361557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial abundance and stochasticity influence competitive outcome in communities.
    Dallas T; Melbourne BA; Legault G; Hastings A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jul; 90(7):1691-1700. PubMed ID: 33759453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local community size mediates ecological drift and competition in metacommunities.
    Orrock JL; Watling JI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jul; 277(1691):2185-91. PubMed ID: 20236983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demographic stochasticity alters the outcome of exploitation competition.
    Okuyama T
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 365():347-51. PubMed ID: 25451527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How similar can co-occurring species be in the presence of competition and ecological drift?
    Capitán JA; Cuenda S; Alonso D
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Sep; 12(110):0604. PubMed ID: 26269234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects.
    Grainger TN; Letten AD; Gilbert B; Fukami T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(13):6205-6210. PubMed ID: 30850518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism.
    Johnson CA; Bronstein JL
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02708. PubMed ID: 30924140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stochasticity of individual competition and local matchup inequality for saplings in a niche-structured forest.
    Hoshizaki K; Takahashi S; Tanaka H; Oki S; Matsushita M
    Ecology; 2022 Apr; 103(4):e3624. PubMed ID: 34967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced plant competition among kin can be explained by Jensen's inequality.
    Simonsen AK; Chow T; Stinchcombe JR
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Dec; 4(23):4454-66. PubMed ID: 25512842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of competition on fitness depend on the sex of both competitors.
    Iglesias-Carrasco M; Brookes S; Kruuk LEB; Head ML
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Sep; 10(18):9808-9826. PubMed ID: 33005346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of interference competition.
    Grether GF; Okamoto KW
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 35986619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A native annual forb locally excludes a closely related introduced species that co-occurs in oak-savanna habitat remnants.
    Johnson JC; Williams JL
    AoB Plants; 2020 Oct; 12(5):plaa045. PubMed ID: 33033590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological versatility and the assembly of multiple competitors: cautionary notes for assembly inferences.
    Saito VS; Laroche F; Siqueira T; Pavoine S
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 29479674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic competitive exclusion leads to a cascade of species extinctions.
    Capitán JA; Cuenda S; Alonso D
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():137-151. PubMed ID: 28189668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cheating fosters species co-existence in well-mixed bacterial communities.
    Leinweber A; Fredrik Inglis R; Kümmerli R
    ISME J; 2017 May; 11(5):1179-1188. PubMed ID: 28060362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theory of time-averaged neutral dynamics with environmental stochasticity.
    Danino M; Shnerb NM
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Apr; 97(4-1):042406. PubMed ID: 29758719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental variation, stochastic extinction, and competitive coexistence.
    Adler PB; Drake JM
    Am Nat; 2008 Nov; 172(5):186-95. PubMed ID: 18817458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scramble in behaviour and ecology.
    Parker GA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 355(1403):1637-45. PubMed ID: 11127910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergent niche structuring leads to increased differences from neutrality in species abundance distributions.
    Rael RC; D'Andrea R; Barabás G; Ostling A
    Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1633-1643. PubMed ID: 29655259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.