These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2636183)

  • 1. [Enamel-dentinal adhesives in amalgam restorations].
    Anderlini G; Calandriello R
    Dent Cadmos; 1989 Apr; 57(6):72-8, 81. PubMed ID: 2636183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Loher CE
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jun; 22(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 1882038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The control of marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive: a pilot study.
    Ben-Amar A; Nordenberg D; Liberman R; Fischer J; Gorfil C
    Dent Mater; 1987 Apr; 3(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 3326765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
    Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental use of dentin bonding agents and a cavity varnish to reduce marginal microleakage in high copper amalgam restorations].
    Aras S; Cetiner S
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2700122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
    Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of three cavity varnishes in reducing marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Ulukapi I; Lussi A; Stich H; Hotz P
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 1308785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bonding of silver amalgam to dental hard tissue: study of the seal of Amalgambond].
    Scherman L; Boerdah H; Montekio F
    Chir Dent Fr; 1990 Dec-13; 60(543):61-3. PubMed ID: 2289395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Blixt M; Coli P
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amalgam restorations using an adhesive resin cement as a cavity liner--basic technique and three clinical cases.
    Shimizu A; Ui T; Kawakami M; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1987 Dec; 27():147-55. PubMed ID: 3506075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesives, silver amalgam.
    Oral Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):49-50, 52. PubMed ID: 8779743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.