778 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26362074)
1. Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies.
Gertych A; Ing N; Ma Z; Fuchs TJ; Salman S; Mohanty S; Bhele S; Velásquez-Vacca A; Amin MB; Knudsen BS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2(Pt 2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26362074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kernel-based learning from both qualitative and quantitative labels: application to prostate cancer diagnosis based on multiparametric MR imaging.
Niaf É; Flamary R; Rouvière O; Lartizien C; Canu S
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):979-91. PubMed ID: 24464613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined unsupervised-supervised classification of multiparametric PET/MRI data: application to prostate cancer.
Gatidis S; Scharpf M; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Küstner T; Hennenlotter J; Kruck S; Kaufmann S; Schraml C; la Fougère C; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
NMR Biomed; 2015 Jul; 28(7):914-22. PubMed ID: 26014883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A boosting cascade for automated detection of prostate cancer from digitized histology.
Doyle S; Madabhushi A; Feldman M; Tomaszeweski J
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):504-11. PubMed ID: 17354810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel morphometric based classification via diffeomorphic based shape representation using manifold learning.
Sparks R; Madabhushi A
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):658-65. PubMed ID: 20879457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI.
Madabhushi A; Feldman MD; Metaxas DN; Tomaszeweski J; Chute D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1611-25. PubMed ID: 16350920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective invocation of shape priors for deformable segmentation and morphologic classification of prostate cancer tissue microarrays.
Ali S; Veltri R; Epstein JI; Christudass C; Madabhushi A
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Apr; 41():3-13. PubMed ID: 25466771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Co-trained convolutional neural networks for automated detection of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI.
Yang X; Liu C; Wang Z; Yang J; Min HL; Wang L; Cheng KT
Med Image Anal; 2017 Dec; 42():212-227. PubMed ID: 28850876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images.
Tabesh A; Teverovskiy M; Pang HY; Kumar VP; Verbel D; Kotsianti A; Saidi O
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1366-78. PubMed ID: 17948727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier.
Chan I; Wells W; Mulkern RV; Haker S; Zhang J; Zou KH; Maier SE; Tempany CM
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2390-8. PubMed ID: 14528961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A data-driven approach to prostate cancer detection from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Haq NF; Kozlowski P; Jones EC; Chang SD; Goldenberg SL; Moradi M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Apr; 41():37-45. PubMed ID: 25060941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated training data generation for microscopy focus classification.
Gao D; Padfield D; Rittscher J; McKay R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 2):446-53. PubMed ID: 20879346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiview boosting digital pathology analysis of prostate cancer.
Kwak JT; Hewitt SM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Apr; 142():91-99. PubMed ID: 28325451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrated local binary pattern texture features for classification of breast tissue imaged by optical coherence microscopy.
Wan S; Lee HC; Huang X; Xu T; Xu T; Zeng X; Zhang Z; Sheikine Y; Connolly JL; Fujimoto JG; Zhou C
Med Image Anal; 2017 May; 38():104-116. PubMed ID: 28327449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selecting features with group-sparse nonnegative supervised canonical correlation analysis: multimodal prostate cancer prognosis.
Wang H; Singanamalli A; Ginsburg S; Madabhushi A
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 3):385-92. PubMed ID: 25320823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Shah V; Turkbey B; Mani H; Pang Y; Pohida T; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Bernardo M
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4093-103. PubMed ID: 22830742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles.
Barker J; Hoogi A; Depeursinge A; Rubin DL
Med Image Anal; 2016 May; 30():60-71. PubMed ID: 26854941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gland ring morphometry for prostate cancer prognosis in multispectral immunofluorescence images.
Scott R; Khan FM; Zeineh J; Donovan M; Fernandez G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):585-92. PubMed ID: 25333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
