These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26363591)

  • 1. Reliability and Validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A Systematic Review.
    Hales M; Biros E; Reznik JE
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2015; 21(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 26363591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: factors influencing the frequency, completion and accuracy of documentation of neurology for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Osunronbi T; Sharma H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Dec; 29(8):1639-1648. PubMed ID: 31324967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interrater reliability of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury in youths with chronic spinal cord injury.
    Mulcahey MJ; Gaughan JP; Chafetz RS; Vogel LC; Samdani AF; Betz RR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21807145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and repeatability of the motor and sensory examination of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.
    Marino RJ; Jones L; Kirshblum S; Tal J; Dasgupta A
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2008; 31(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18581663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores.
    Scivoletto G; Tamburella F; Laurenza L; Molinari M
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Jun; 49(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 23486305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffusion tensor imaging in pediatric spinal cord injury: preliminary examination of reliability and clinical correlation.
    Mulcahey MJ; Samdani A; Gaughan J; Barakat N; Faro S; Betz RR; Finsterbusch J; Mohamed FB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E797-803. PubMed ID: 22210015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury in patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions.
    Lena E; Baroncini I; Pavese C; Musumeci G; Volini S; Masciullo M; Aiachini B; Fizzotti G; Puci MV; Scivoletto G
    Spinal Cord; 2022 Jan; 60(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 34326462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the Risk for Central Pain Using the Sensory Components of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.
    Levitan Y; Zeilig G; Bondi M; Ringler E; Defrin R
    J Neurotrauma; 2015 Nov; 32(21):1684-92. PubMed ID: 26244708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Classification Accuracy and Challenges.
    Snider BA; Eren F; Reeves RK; Rupp R; Kirshblum SC
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2023; 29(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 36819931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Score Based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury for Integrative Evaluation of Changes in Sensorimotor Functions.
    Grassner L; Garcia-Ovejero D; Mach O; Lopez-Dolado E; Vargas-Baquero E; Alcobendas-Maestro M; Esclarin A; Sanktjohaneser L; Wutte C; Becker J; Lener S; Hartmann S; Girod PP; Kögl N; Griessenauer CJ; Papadopoulus M; Geisler F; Thome C; Molina-Holgado E; Vidal J; Curt A; Scivoletto G; Guest J; Maier D; Weidner N; Rupp R; Kramer JLK; Arevalo-Martin A
    J Neurotrauma; 2022 May; 39(9-10):613-626. PubMed ID: 34937399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sacral sparing in SCI: beyond the S4-S5 and anorectal examination.
    Zariffa J; Kramer JL; Jones LA; Lammertse DP; Curt A; ; Steeves JD
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):389-400.e3. PubMed ID: 22572584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Mar; 29(5):905-14. PubMed ID: 21568688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-Dependent Discrepancies between Assessments of Sensory Function after Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Macklin RA; Bae J; Orell M; Anderson KD; Ellaway PH; Perez MA
    J Neurotrauma; 2017 May; 34(9):1778-1786. PubMed ID: 27203696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: relationship between S4-5 dermatome testing and anorectal testing.
    Samdani A; Chafetz RS; Vogel LC; Betz RR; Gaughan JP; Mulcahey MJ
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Mar; 49(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 21042330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interview based approach to the anorectal portion of the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Exam (I-A-ISNCSCI): a pilot study.
    Chun A; Delgado AD; Tsai CY; Spielman L; Taylor K; Ramirez A; Huang V; Kolakowsky-Hayner SA; Escalon MX; Bryce TN
    Spinal Cord; 2020 May; 58(5):553-559. PubMed ID: 31822807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury.
    Macklin RA; Brooke VJ; Calabro FJ; Ellaway PH; Perez MA
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Jan; 54(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 26123212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.
    Armstrong AJ; Clark JM; Ho DT; Payne CJ; Nolan S; Goodes LM; Harvey LA; Marshall R; Galea MP; Dunlop SA
    Spinal Cord; 2017 Nov; 55(11):994-1001. PubMed ID: 28631745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: classification skills of clinicians versus computational algorithms.
    Schuld C; Franz S; van Hedel HJ; Moosburger J; Maier D; Abel R; van de Meent H; Curt A; Weidner N; ; Rupp R
    Spinal Cord; 2015 Apr; 53(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 25487243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance.
    Schuld C; Franz S; Brüggemann K; Heutehaus L; Weidner N; Kirshblum SC; Rupp R;
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2016 Sep; 39(5):504-12. PubMed ID: 27301061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: reliability of data when applied to children and youths.
    Mulcahey MJ; Gaughan J; Betz RR; Johansen KJ
    Spinal Cord; 2007 Jun; 45(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 17016490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.