These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The harmful, nontherapeutic use of animals in research is morally wrong. Nobis N Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 21952174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on "Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research". Eggel M; Neuhaus CP; Grimm H Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jan; 29(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 31858941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal research, non-vegetarianism, and the moral status of animals--understanding the impasse of the animal rights problem. Li HL J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):589-615. PubMed ID: 12461712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral imagination in tissue engineering research on animal models. Nordgren A Biomaterials; 2004 Apr; 25(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 14697873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The moral status of invasive animal research. Rollin BE Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; Suppl():S4-6. PubMed ID: 23138430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human-Animal Chimeras: The Moral Insignificance of Uniquely Human Capacities. Koplin JJ Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Sep; 49(5):23-32. PubMed ID: 31581332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of animal models in behavioural neuroscience research. Bovenkerk B; Kaldewaij F Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2015; 19():17-46. PubMed ID: 25031123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morally relevant differences between animals and human beings justifying the use of animals in biomedical research. Dennis JU J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Mar; 210(5):612-8. PubMed ID: 9054986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The upper limits of pain and suffering in animal research. Beauchamp TL; Morton DB Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Oct; 24(4):431-47. PubMed ID: 26364778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of basic animal research. Carbone L Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; Suppl():S12-5. PubMed ID: 23138422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biocentric ethics and animal prosperity. Anchustegui AT Int J Appl Philos; 2005; 19(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 16276672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals. Vieira de Castro AC; Olsson IA Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2015; 19():47-78. PubMed ID: 24844681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review. DeGrazia D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Mar; 1(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 11645700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of nonhuman animals in biomedical research. Ringach DL Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 21817874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metaphysical and ethical perspectives on creating animal-human chimeras. Eberl JT; Ballard RA J Med Philos; 2009 Oct; 34(5):470-86. PubMed ID: 19692673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Animal abolitionism meets moral abolitionism : cutting the Gordian knot of applied ethics. Marks J J Bioeth Inq; 2013 Dec; 10(4):445-55. PubMed ID: 24092403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Could it be permissible to prevent the existence of morally enhanced people? Persson I J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):692-3. PubMed ID: 22918293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]