301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365009)
1. Outpatient cervical ripening.
Amorosa JM; Stone JL
Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 26365009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review.
Greenberg V; Khalifeh A
Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 26338441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Durie D; Lawal A; Zegelbone P
Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 26341067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
Abdellah MS; Hussien M; Aboalhassan A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20582425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Kelly AJ; Munson C; Minden L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jun; (6):CD006901. PubMed ID: 21678363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour: Excessive, uterine activity is a maternal, neurological emergency.
Quinn MJ
BJOG; 2016 Nov; 123(12):2048. PubMed ID: 27753252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial.
Mirteimouri M; Pourali L; Najaf Najafi M; Ghaffarian Omid M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 40(6):792-796. PubMed ID: 31852287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term: comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient administration.
Chang DW; Velazquez MD; Colyer M; Klaus P; Mallipeddi SK; Rayburn WF
J Reprod Med; 2005 Oct; 50(10):735-9. PubMed ID: 16320553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations.
Stephenson ML; Wing DA
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2015; 9():2321-7. PubMed ID: 25960635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.
Stephenson ML; Hawkins JS; Powers BL; Wing DA
Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Jan; 10(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 24328596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
