These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365009)

  • 21. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 92(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 16325816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective Comparison of PGE
    Blair R; Harvey MA; Pudwell J; Bougie O
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32482470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Wilkinson C; Adelson P; Turnbull D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 May; 15():126. PubMed ID: 26018581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study.
    Beckwith L; Magner K; Kritzer S; Warshak CR
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jul; 30(13):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 27560557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Survey on cervical ripening practices in France].
    Bel S; Gaudineau A; Zorgnotti L; Sananes N; Fritz G; Langer B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 May; 42(5):301-5. PubMed ID: 24411337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ugwu EO; Onah HE; Obi SN; Dim CC; Okezie OA; Chigbu CO; Okoro OS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 33(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 23919853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.
    Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
    Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is the optimal duration of oral misoprostol treatment for cervical ripening?
    Drakopoulos P; Duyck C; Gayet-Ageron A; Fernandez S; Irion O; Martinez de Tejada B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jun; 30(12):1494-1499. PubMed ID: 27493019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.