These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365045)

  • 1. Single-center trials in neonatology: Issues to consider.
    Sinha IP; Sinha SK
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 26365045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review.
    Unverzagt S; Prondzinsky R; Peinemann F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1271-80. PubMed ID: 23972520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Ten Have TR; Kimmel SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 135(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 11453711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The tactics of large randomized trials.
    Slobogean GP; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():19-23. PubMed ID: 22810442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and conduct of a large obstetric or neonatal randomized controlled trial.
    Tarnow-Mordi W; Cruz M; Morris J
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 26522427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical recommendations of Cochrane reviews in three different fields of pediatrics (neonatology, neuropediatrics, and complementary and alternative medicine): a systematic analysis.
    Meyer S; Schroeder N; Willhelm C; Gortner L; Girisch W
    Pediatr Int; 2013 Jun; 55(3):396-8. PubMed ID: 23566199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do multicenter randomized controlled trials not confirm the positive findings of single center randomized controlled trials in acute care?
    Landoni G; Pieri M; Young PJ; Bellomo R
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Feb; 85(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 30394068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based therapy in neonatology: distilling the evidence and applying it in practice.
    Sinclair JC
    Acta Paediatr; 2004 Sep; 93(9):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15384873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The activities of the Child Care and Neonatal Medicine Institute at the University of Parma].
    Moretti M
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1991; 62(1-2):25-37. PubMed ID: 1840368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The account for provider and center effects in multicenter interventional and surgical randomized controlled trials is in need of improvement: a review.
    Biau DJ; Porcher R; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 18394535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias?
    Mills EJ; Ayers D; Chou R; Thorlund K
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):2-7. PubMed ID: 26232560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological issues in the design and analyses of neonatal research studies: Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.
    Das A; Tyson J; Pedroza C; Schmidt B; Gantz M; Wallace D; Truog WE; Higgins RD
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):374-384. PubMed ID: 27344192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond HERS: some (not so) random thoughts on randomized clinical trials.
    Bush T
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 11374656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ethics of neonatal research: A trialists' perspective.
    DeMauro SB; Foglia EE; Schmidt B
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 26394826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials.
    Ioannidis JP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18537784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. n-of-1 randomized controlled trials: an opportunity for complementary and alternative medicine evaluation.
    Johnston BC; Mills E
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Dec; 10(6):979-84. PubMed ID: 15673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.