1655 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365063)
1. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Malak M; Masuda D; Ogura T; Imoto A; Abdelaal UM; Sabet EA; Abo Dahab LH; Higuchi K
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26365063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of diagnostic value of cytologic sampling by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and that by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the management of pancreatic mass without biliary stricture.
Wakatsuki T; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Shibukawa G; Takagi T; Yamamoto G; Takahashi Y; Yamada Y; Watanabe K; Obara K; Suzuki T; Sato Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2005 Nov; 20(11):1707-11. PubMed ID: 16246190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy and safety of single-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of pancreatic masses.
Noma Y; Kawamoto H; Kato H; Iwamuro M; Hirao K; Fujii M; Tsutsumi K; Horiguchi S; Yamamoto N; Sakakihara I; Tomoda T; Matsumoto K; Okada H; Yamamoto K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 61(134):1775-9. PubMed ID: 25436378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Same-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter experience.
Jo JH; Cho CM; Jun JH; Chung MJ; Kim TH; Seo DW; Kim J; Park DH;
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Apr; 34(4):799-805. PubMed ID: 30378169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study.
Weilert F; Bhat YM; Binmoeller KF; Kane S; Jaffee IM; Shaw RE; Cameron R; Hashimoto Y; Shah JN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Jul; 80(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 24559784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for obstructing pancreas head masses: combined or separate procedures?
Aslanian HR; Estrada JD; Rossi F; Dziura J; Jamidar PA; Siddiqui UD
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 45(8):711-3. PubMed ID: 21301359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with papillary biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Jung JG; Lee JK; Lee KH; Lee KT; Woo YS; Paik WH; Park DH; Lee SS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 25891790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.
Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Jun; 97(6):1386-91. PubMed ID: 12094855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.
Yusuf TE; Ho S; Pavey DA; Michael H; Gress FG
Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 19418399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of combined endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and stenting in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.
Camus M; Trouilloud I; Villacis AL; Mangialavori L; Duchmann JC; Gaudric M; Roseau G; Terris B; Mitry E; Chaussade S; Prat F
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Nov; 24(11):1281-7. PubMed ID: 22890210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lower yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with pancreatic head mass with a biliary stent.
Kim JJ; Walia S; Lee SH; Patel B; Vetsa M; Zhao Y; Srikureja W; Laine L
Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Feb; 60(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25245115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer.
Ikezawa K; Uehara H; Sakai A; Fukutake N; Imanaka K; Ohkawa K; Tanakura R; Ioka T; Tanaka S; Ishikawa O; Katayama K
J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):966-72. PubMed ID: 23065024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic efficacy of liquid-based cytology for solid pancreatic lesion samples obtained with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Propensity score-matched analysis.
Hashimoto S; Taguchi H; Higashi M; Hatanaka K; Fujita T; Iwaya H; Nakazawa J; Arima S; Iwashita Y; Sasaki F; Nasu Y; Kanmura S; Ido A
Dig Endosc; 2017 Jul; 29(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 28160342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance and safety of diagnostic EUS FNA/FNB and therapeutic ERCP in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer - results from a population-based, prospective cohort study.
Farnes I; Paulsen V; Verbeke CS; Tønnesen CJ; Aabakken L; Labori KJ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; 59(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 38126766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pancreatic juice cytology and/or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for pancreatic tumor.
Matsumoto K; Takeda Y; Harada K; Horie Y; Yashima K; Murawaki Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 29(1):223-7. PubMed ID: 23869654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeated endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) improved diagnostic yield of inconclusive initial cytology for suspected pancreatic cancer and unknown intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.
Prachayakul V; Sriprayoon T; Asawakul P; Pongprasobchai S; Pausawasdi N; Kachintorn U
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Feb; 95 Suppl 2():S68-74. PubMed ID: 22574532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
