These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365126)
1. Design principles for engaging and retaining virtual citizen scientists. Wald DM; Longo J; Dobell AR Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 26365126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. van der Wal R; Sharma N; Mellish C; Robinson A; Siddharthan A Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):550-61. PubMed ID: 27111194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of volunteer and project characteristics on data quality of biological surveys. Lewandowski E; Specht H Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):713-23. PubMed ID: 25800171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Merenlender AM; Crall AW; Drill S; Prysby M; Ballard H Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 27109290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A framework for evaluating and designing citizen science programs for natural resources monitoring. Chase SK; Levine A Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):456-66. PubMed ID: 27111860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology. Brown ED; Williams BK Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 30242907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Asah ST; Blahna DJ Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):866-75. PubMed ID: 23656329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Studying citizen science through adaptive management and learning feedbacks as mechanisms for improving conservation. Jordan R; Gray S; Sorensen A; Newman G; Mellor D; Newman G; Hmelo-Silver C; LaDeau S; Biehler D; Crall A Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 26585836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing community preparedness: an inventory and analysis of disaster citizen science activities. Chari R; Petrun Sayers EL; Amiri S; Leinhos M; Kotzias V; Madrigano J; Thomas EV; Carbone EG; Uscher-Pines L BMC Public Health; 2019 Oct; 19(1):1356. PubMed ID: 31646999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping epistemic cultures and learning potential of participants in citizen science projects. Vallabh P; Lotz-Sisitka H; O'Donoghue R; Schudel I Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 27110848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers. Beza E; Steinke J; van Etten J; Reidsma P; Fadda C; Mittra S; Mathur P; Kooistra L PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175700. PubMed ID: 28472823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recruitment and Retention of Volunteers in a Citizen Science Network to Detect Invasive Species on Private Lands. Andow DA; Borgida E; Hurley TM; Williams AL Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 58(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 27539361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initiating and continuing participation in citizen science for natural history. Everett G; Geoghegan H BMC Ecol; 2016 Jul; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):13. PubMed ID: 27459851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the emergence of pro-biodiversity practices in citizen scientists of a backyard butterfly survey. Deguines N; Princé K; Prévot AC; Fontaine B Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 716():136842. PubMed ID: 32024588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why (not) participate in citizen science? Motivational factors and barriers to participate in a citizen science program for malaria control in Rwanda. Asingizwe D; Poortvliet PM; Koenraadt CJM; van Vliet AJH; Ingabire CM; Mutesa L; Leeuwis C PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237396. PubMed ID: 32833984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP. Hadad S; Zhitomirsky-Geffet M; Shah H; Rigler D; Celentano U; Tiensuu H; Röning J; Vallverdú J; Csabella EJ; Stepankova O; Gialelis J; Lantavou K; Ignat T; Masone G; Winter J; Dumitrasco M PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294575. PubMed ID: 38015965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drivers of support for citizen science across state wildlife management agencies in the United States. Van Buskirk AN; Boley BB; Killmaster CH; Johannsen KL; D'Angelo GJ Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14028. PubMed ID: 36317723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of long-term volunteer water monitoring data: A multiscale analysis from a statewide citizen science program. Albus KH; Thompson R; Mitchell F; Kennedy J; Ponette-González AG PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227540. PubMed ID: 31995580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects' success and longevity. Cunha DGF; Marques JF; Resende JC; Falco PB; Souza CM; Loiselle SA An Acad Bras Cienc; 2017; 89(3 Suppl):2229-2245. PubMed ID: 28678962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retaining volunteers in volunteer computing projects. Darch P; Carusi A Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Sep; 368(1926):4177-92. PubMed ID: 20679130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]