595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365379)
41. MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells.
Lemaçon D; Jackson J; Quinet A; Brickner JR; Li S; Yazinski S; You Z; Ira G; Zou L; Mosammaparast N; Vindigni A
Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):860. PubMed ID: 29038425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Acute MUS81 depletion leads to replication fork slowing and a constitutive DNA damage response.
Xing M; Wang X; Palmai-Pallag T; Shen H; Helleday T; Hickson ID; Ying S
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(35):37638-46. PubMed ID: 26415217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Redox-sensitive alteration of replisome architecture safeguards genome integrity.
Somyajit K; Gupta R; Sedlackova H; Neelsen KJ; Ochs F; Rask MB; Choudhary C; Lukas J
Science; 2017 Nov; 358(6364):797-802. PubMed ID: 29123070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Removal of RTF2 from Stalled Replisomes Promotes Maintenance of Genome Integrity.
Kottemann MC; Conti BA; Lach FP; Smogorzewska A
Mol Cell; 2018 Jan; 69(1):24-35.e5. PubMed ID: 29290612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes.
Bakkenist CJ; Kastan MB
DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Dec; 36():8-12. PubMed ID: 26391293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. 53BP1 and BRCA1 control pathway choice for stalled replication restart.
Xu Y; Ning S; Wei Z; Xu R; Xu X; Xing M; Guo R; Xu D
Elife; 2017 Nov; 6():. PubMed ID: 29106372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. PARPi focus the spotlight on replication fork protection in cancer.
Schlacher K
Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Oct; 19(11):1309-1310. PubMed ID: 29087384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How cancer cells hijack DNA double-strand break repair pathways to gain genomic instability.
Jeggo PA; Löbrich M
Biochem J; 2015 Oct; 471(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26392571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity.
Vujanovic M; Krietsch J; Raso MC; Terraneo N; Zellweger R; Schmid JA; Taglialatela A; Huang JW; Holland CL; Zwicky K; Herrador R; Jacobs H; Cortez D; Ciccia A; Penengo L; Lopes M
Mol Cell; 2017 Sep; 67(5):882-890.e5. PubMed ID: 28886337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. ATR inhibition disrupts rewired homologous recombination and fork protection pathways in PARP inhibitor-resistant BRCA-deficient cancer cells.
Yazinski SA; Comaills V; Buisson R; Genois MM; Nguyen HD; Ho CK; Todorova Kwan T; Morris R; Lauffer S; Nussenzweig A; Ramaswamy S; Benes CH; Haber DA; Maheswaran S; Birrer MJ; Zou L
Genes Dev; 2017 Feb; 31(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 28242626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. ATR Plays a Direct Antiapoptotic Role at Mitochondria, which Is Regulated by Prolyl Isomerase Pin1.
Hilton BA; Li Z; Musich PR; Wang H; Cartwright BM; Serrano M; Zhou XZ; Lu KP; Zou Y
Mol Cell; 2015 Oct; 60(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 26387736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Replication Stress: A Lifetime of Epigenetic Change.
Khurana S; Oberdoerffer P
Genes (Basel); 2015 Sep; 6(3):858-77. PubMed ID: 26378584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. RADX Modulates RAD51 Activity to Control Replication Fork Protection.
Bhat KP; Krishnamoorthy A; Dungrawala H; Garcin EB; Modesti M; Cortez D
Cell Rep; 2018 Jul; 24(3):538-545. PubMed ID: 30021152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Ahuja AK; Jodkowska K; Teloni F; Bizard AH; Zellweger R; Herrador R; Ortega S; Hickson ID; Altmeyer M; Mendez J; Lopes M
Nat Commun; 2016 Feb; 7():10660. PubMed ID: 26876348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast.
Sabatinos SA; Forsburg SL
Biomolecules; 2015 Sep; 5(3):2123-39. PubMed ID: 26393661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. EZH2 promotes degradation of stalled replication forks by recruiting MUS81 through histone H3 trimethylation.
Rondinelli B; Gogola E; Yücel H; Duarte AA; van de Ven M; van der Sluijs R; Konstantinopoulos PA; Jonkers J; Ceccaldi R; Rottenberg S; D'Andrea AD
Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 29035360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Identification of a Substrate Recognition Domain in the Replication Stress Response Protein Zinc Finger Ran-binding Domain-containing Protein 3 (ZRANB3).
Badu-Nkansah A; Mason AC; Eichman BF; Cortez D
J Biol Chem; 2016 Apr; 291(15):8251-7. PubMed ID: 26884333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Stability of blocked replication forks in vivo.
Mettrick KA; Grainge I
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jan; 44(2):657-68. PubMed ID: 26490956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Replication Initiation Protein Sld3/Treslin Orchestrates the Assembly of the Replication Fork Helicase during S Phase.
Bruck I; Kaplan DL
J Biol Chem; 2015 Nov; 290(45):27414-27424. PubMed ID: 26405041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Resolution of Recombination Intermediates: Mechanisms and Regulation.
West SC; Blanco MG; Chan YW; Matos J; Sarbajna S; Wyatt HD
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2015; 80():103-9. PubMed ID: 26370409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
