138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26365872)
1. Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?
Rahbar H; Parsian S; Lam DL; Dontchos BN; Andeen NK; Rendi MH; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 26365872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Values of Minimal Apparent Diffusion Coefficient,Difference between Ratios of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients,and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Diagnosing Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion].
Wu P; Cui L; Guo BH; Wang YC; Cui JS
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 41(6):737-745. PubMed ID: 31907122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 22517955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined application of pharamcokinetic DCE-MRI and IVIM-DWI could improve detection efficiency in early diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tao WJ; Zhang HX; Zhang LM; Gao F; Huang W; Liu Y; Zhu Y; Bai GJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):142-150. PubMed ID: 31124276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.
Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):2011-9. PubMed ID: 21562806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction Model For Extensive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Around Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer.
Knuttel FM; van der Velden BH; Loo CE; Elias SG; Wesseling J; van den Bosch MA; Gilhuijs KG
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 26863579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.
Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discriminating low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from non-low-grade DCIS or DCIS upgraded to invasive carcinoma: effective texture features on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Mori N; Abe H; Mugikura S; Miyashita M; Mori Y; Oguma Y; Hirasawa M; Sato S; Takase K
Breast Cancer; 2021 Sep; 28(5):1141-1153. PubMed ID: 33900583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of 3 T versus 1.5 T breast MRI for pre-operative assessment of extent of disease in newly diagnosed DCIS.
Rahbar H; DeMartini WB; Lee AY; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 25604909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Shan Y; Ji Y; Chen CZ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 20657216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 127 Cases.
Li W; Zhou Q; Xia S; Wu Y; Fei X; Wang Y; Tao L; Fan J; Zhou W
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 31206200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
