These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26366646)

  • 1. How psychophysical methods influence optimizations of color difference formulas.
    Kirchner E; Dekker N; Lucassen M; Njo L; van der Lans I; Urban P; Huertas R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Mar; 32(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 26366646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How color difference formulas depend on reference pairs in the underlying constant stimuli experiment.
    Kirchner E; Dekker N; Lucassen M; Njo L; van der Lans I; Koeckhoven P; Urban P; Huertas R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Dec; 32(12):2373-83. PubMed ID: 26831391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring color differences in automotive samples with lightness flop: a test of the AUDI2000 color-difference formula.
    Melgosa M; Martínez-García J; Gómez-Robledo L; Perales E; Martínez-Verdú FM; Dauser T
    Opt Express; 2014 Feb; 22(3):3458-67. PubMed ID: 24663636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
    Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization of color-difference formulas for any illuminant and any observer by assuming perfect color constancy in a color-vision model based on the OSA-UCS system.
    Oleari C; Melgosa M; Huertas R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Nov; 28(11):2226-34. PubMed ID: 22048289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Color-difference evaluation for 3D objects.
    Jiang L; Cui G; Melgosa M; Xiao K; Sueeprasan S
    Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 29(15):24237-24254. PubMed ID: 34614673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power functions improving the performance of color-difference formulas.
    Huang M; Cui G; Melgosa M; Sánchez-Marañón M; Li C; Luo MR; Liu H
    Opt Express; 2015 Jan; 23(1):597-610. PubMed ID: 25835705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of select color-difference formulas in the blue region.
    Shamey R; Cao R; Tomasino T; Zaidy SS; Iqbal K; Lin J; Lee SG
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1328-36. PubMed ID: 24977373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analyzing small suprathreshold differences of LCD-generated colors.
    Urban P; Fedutina M; Lissner I
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Jul; 28(7):1500-12. PubMed ID: 21734751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing Color-Difference Formulas for 3D-Printed Objects.
    Huang M; Gao X; Pan J; Li X; Hemingray C; Xiao K; Melgosa M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing Parametric Factors in CIELAB and CIEDE2000 Color-Difference Formulas for 3D-Printed Spherical Objects.
    He R; Xiao K; Pointer M; Melgosa M; Bressler Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysical determination of boundaries and smoothness of color gradients.
    Xiong N; Shamey R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2024 Mar; 41(3):572-580. PubMed ID: 38437449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative significance of the terms in the CIEDE2000 and CIE94 color-difference formulas.
    Melgosa M; Huertas R; Berns RS
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2269-75. PubMed ID: 15603061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of naïve and expert subjects in the assessment of small color differences.
    Shamey R; Cárdenas LM; Hinks D; Woodard R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Jun; 27(6):1482-9. PubMed ID: 20508719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromaticity-discrimination thresholds with aperture and object colors: experimental results and predictions of some recent color-difference formulas.
    Melgosa M; Perez MM; Hita E
    Appl Opt; 1996 Jan; 35(1):176-87. PubMed ID: 21068996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries.
    Montag ED; Fairchild MD
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1997; 6(7):977-89. PubMed ID: 18282988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical processing of color images with incoherent illumination: orientation-selective edge enhancement using a modified liquid-crystal display.
    Fernández A; Alonso JR; Flores JL; Ayubi GA; Di Martino JM; Ferrari JA
    Opt Express; 2011 Oct; 19(21):21091-7. PubMed ID: 21997117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 21910520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Color difference formulas and visual acceptability.
    Strocka D
    Appl Opt; 1971 Jun; 10(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 20111110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.