198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26366666)
21. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension.
Bedford ND; Seman EI; O'Shea RT; Keirse MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 23321154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Luchristt D; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3005-3011. PubMed ID: 35020034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.
Slopnick EA; Petrikovets A; Sheyn D; Kim SP; Nguyen CT; Hijaz AK
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):603-609. PubMed ID: 30283975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Apical suspension is underutilized for repair of stage IV pelvic organ prolapse: an analysis of national practice patterns in the United States.
Slopnick EA; Chapman GC; Roberts K; Sheyn DD; El-Nashar S; Mahajan ST
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):791-797. PubMed ID: 32507910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of concurrent pelvic organ prolapse reconstructive surgery on midurethral sling procedure outcome.
Çoşkun B; Aksakal OS; Çoşkun B; Yurtçu E; Akkurt MÖ; Kafadar Ö; Doğanay M
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 29781073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.
Maher C; Yeung E; Haya N; Christmann-Schmid C; Mowat A; Chen Z; Baessler K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):CD012376. PubMed ID: 37493538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Long-term review on posterior colporrhaphy with levator ani muscles plication and incorporating a Vypro II mesh].
El Haddad R; Martan A; Masata J; Svabík K; Koleska T
Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Aug; 74(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 20564983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of concomitant hysterectomy on complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Selle JM; Hokenstad ED; Habermann EB; Bews KA; Occhino JA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):321-327. PubMed ID: 37436464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
