These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26367363)
1. Informed consent to breech birth in New Zealand. Powell R; Walker S; Barrett A N Z Med J; 2015 Aug; 128(1418):85-92. PubMed ID: 26367363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate]. Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004. Nassar N; Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Peat B Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 17068683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland. Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery. Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Australia 1991-2005. Sullivan EA; Moran K; Chapman M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 19780725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia. Homer CS; Watts NP; Petrovska K; Sjostedt CM; Bisits A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Apr; 15():89. PubMed ID: 25885035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [External cephalic version at term]. Zwoliński J; Pawłowska A; Bańkowska EM; Lisawa J; Leibschang J; Bogdan C Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2003; 7(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 13130172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The benefit of external version in full-term breech presentation]. van de Pavert R; Bennebroek Gravenhorst J; Keirse MJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Nov; 134(46):2245-8. PubMed ID: 2255352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of breech version by acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67, including moxibustion, for women with a breech foetus at 33 weeks gestation: a modelling approach. van den Berg I; Kaandorp GC; Bosch JL; Duvekot JJ; Arends LR; Hunink MG Complement Ther Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20430289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [External cephalic version of breech presentation]. Sande HA Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3153-4. PubMed ID: 8273041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants. van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section. Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term. Caukwell S; Joels LA; Kyle PM; Mills MS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 12521413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal breech birth: can we move beyond the Term Breech Trial? Hunter LA J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 24762034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit]. Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation]. Vasilj O; Matijević R; Grgić O Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study. Jonsdottir F; Henriksen L; Secher NJ; Maaløe N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25283062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]