315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26370262)
1. Different stimulation protocols for oocyte cryropreservation in oncological patients: a retrospective analysis of single university centre.
Simi G; Obino ME; Casarosa E; Litta P; Artini PG; Cela V
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015; 31(12):966-70. PubMed ID: 26370262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer.
Cakmak H; Rosen MP
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 27(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 25919235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similar in vitro maturation rates of oocytes retrieved during the follicular or luteal phase offer flexible options for urgent fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
Grynberg M; Poulain M; le Parco S; Sifer C; Fanchin R; Frydman N
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 26759139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in cancer patients.
Nazarenko TA; Martirosyan YO; Birukova AM; Korneeva IE; Sokolova J; Khubaeva DG
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021; 37(sup1):13-16. PubMed ID: 34937510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Boots CE; Meister M; Cooper AR; Hardi A; Jungheim ES
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Aug; 33(8):971-80. PubMed ID: 27146151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immature oocyte retrieval and in vitro oocyte maturation at different phases of the menstrual cycle in women with cancer who require urgent gonadotoxic treatment.
Creux H; Monnier P; Son WY; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 27810160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: Comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation - cohort study.
Muteshi C; Child T; Ohuma E; Fatum M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():10-14. PubMed ID: 30227359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation.
Cakmak H; Katz A; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1673-80. PubMed ID: 23987516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Specific protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients.
Cavagna F; Pontes A; Cavagna M; Dzik A; Donadio NF; Portela R; Nagai MT; Gebrim LH
Curr Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(6):e527-e532. PubMed ID: 30607119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy.
Danis RB; Pereira N; Elias RT
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 18(8):609-613. PubMed ID: 28786354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.
Xu B; Li Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Apr; 26(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 23497915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ovarian response after random-start controlled ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve oocytes in cancer patients.
Campos APC; Geber GP; Hurtado R; Sampaio M; Geber S
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Nov; 22(4):352-354. PubMed ID: 30264947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Random-start controlled ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome: a case report.
Cai H; Shen H
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2016; 49(6):e5227. PubMed ID: 27191608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suboptimal response to GnRH-agonist trigger during oocyte cryopreservation: a case series.
Russo M; Liu K; Chan C
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Jun; 18(1):59. PubMed ID: 32503566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Progesterone levels in letrozole associated controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
Goldrat O; Gervy C; Englert Y; Delbaere A; Demeestere I
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2184-9. PubMed ID: 26109617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Luteal phase stimulation, the future of fertility preservation? Retrospective cohort study of luteal phase versus follicular phase stimulation.
Jochum F; Sananès N; Teletin M; Lichtblau I; Rongières C; Pirrello O
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):91-94. PubMed ID: 30439518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in cancer patients is diminished even before oncological treatment.
Domingo J; Guillén V; Ayllón Y; Martínez M; Muñoz E; Pellicer A; Garcia-Velasco JA
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):930-4. PubMed ID: 22283969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random-start ovarian stimulation in women desiring elective cryopreservation of oocytes.
Pereira N; Voskuilen-Gonzalez A; Hancock K; Lekovich JP; Schattman GL; Rosenwaks Z
Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Oct; 35(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 28647355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
