These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26370603)

  • 21. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
    Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
    Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure.
    Bultez T; Quibel T; Bouhanna P; Popowski T; Resche-Rigon M; Rozenberg P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 26183426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission.
    Cuerva MJ; García-Casarrubios P; García-Calvo L; Gutiérrez-Simon M; Ordás P; Magdaleno F; Bartha JL;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Feb; 98(2):162-166. PubMed ID: 30288731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.
    Katzir T; Brezinov Y; Khairish E; Hadad S; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35576076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
    Mendes S; Silva R; Martins I; Santo S; Clode N
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2017 Jun; 63(6):527-531. PubMed ID: 28876429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Angle of progression measured using transperineal ultrasound for prediction of uncomplicated operative vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nassr AA; Hessami K; Berghella V; Bibbo C; Shamshirsaz AA; Shirdel Abdolmaleki A; Marsoosi V; Clark SL; Belfort MA; Shamshirsaz AA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 35238424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Intrapartum Translabial Ultrasound: A Systematic Analysis of The Fetal Head Station in The First Stage of Labor].
    Kohls F; Brodowski L; Kuehnle E; Kniebusch N; Kalache KD; Weichert A
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Feb; 222(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 29245158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
    Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of effects of digital vaginal examination with transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seval MM; Yuce T; Kalafat E; Duman B; Aker SS; Kumbasar H; Koc A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):695-700. PubMed ID: 27300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.
    Rozenberg P; Porcher R; Salomon LJ; Boirot F; Morin C; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18307213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
    Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations.
    Sherer DM; Abulafia O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 21(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 12768551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery.
    Chan YTV; Lau KW; Hui W; Lau CH; Leung WC; Lau WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4905-4909. PubMed ID: 33455498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.
    Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 11896947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Levator hiatus dimensions in late pregnancy and the process of labor: a 3- and 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound study.
    Siafarikas F; Stær-Jensen J; Hilde G; Bø K; Ellström Engh M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24569040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.
    Tutschek B; Torkildsen EA; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 23371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
    Gilboa Y; Frenkel TI; Schlesinger Y; Rousseau S; Hamiel D; Achiron R; Perlman S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 29155474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.
    Popowski T; Porcher R; Fort J; Javoise S; Rozenberg P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 25583399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Ultrasound in monitoring of the second stage of labour].
    Fouché CJ; Simon EG; Potin J; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Nov; 40(11):658-65. PubMed ID: 23099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.