208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26370738)
1. Thick methacrylate sections devoid of lost caps simplify stereological quantifications based on the optical fractionator design.
Hasselholt S; Lykkesfeldt J; Overgaard Larsen J
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Dec; 298(12):2141-50. PubMed ID: 26370738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of differential shrinkage in frozen brain sections and its implications for the use of guard zones in stereology.
Carlo CN; Stevens CF
J Comp Neurol; 2011 Oct; 519(14):2803-10. PubMed ID: 21491430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two distinct events, section compression and loss of particles ("lost caps"), contribute to z-axis distortion and bias in optical disector counting.
Baryshnikova LM; Von Bohlen Und Halbach O; Kaplan S; Von Bartheld CS
Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Sep; 69(9):738-56. PubMed ID: 16845675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential tissue shrinkage and compression in the z-axis: implications for optical disector counting in vibratome-, plastic- and cryosections.
Gardella D; Hatton WJ; Rind HB; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 12648764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pronounced loss of cell nuclei and anisotropic deformation of thick sections.
Andersen ; Gundersen
J Microsc; 1999 Oct; 196(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 29925207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is there section deformation resulting in differential change of nuclear numerical densities along the z axis of thick methacrylate or paraffin sections?
Xu W; Guo Y; Xiang Y; Yang ZW
Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Sep; 82(9):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 31218785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practicable methods for histological section thickness measurement in quantitative stereological analyses.
Matenaers C; Popper B; Rieger A; Wanke R; Blutke A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192879. PubMed ID: 29444158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of frozen sections to determine neuronal number in the murine hippocampus and neocortex using the optical disector and optical fractionator.
Bonthius DJ; McKim R; Koele L; Harb H; Karacay B; Mahoney J; Pantazis NJ
Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2004 Nov; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 15519951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution of Particles in the Z-axis of Tissue Sections: Relevance for Counting Methods.
von Bartheld CS
Neuroquantology; 2012; 10(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 23874137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size.
Dorph-Petersen KA; Nyengaard JR; Gundersen HJ
J Microsc; 2001 Dec; 204(Pt 3):232-46. PubMed ID: 11903800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lost caps in histological counting methods.
Hedreen JC
Anat Rec; 1998 Mar; 250(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 9517853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in thesubdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator.
West MJ; Slomianka L; Gundersen HJ
Anat Rec; 1991 Dec; 231(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 1793176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new method for physical disector analyses of numbers and mean volumes of immunohistochemically labeled cells in paraffin sections.
Hofmann I; Kemter E; Fiedler S; Theobalt N; Fonteyne L; Wolf E; Wanke R; Blutke A
J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Sep; 361():109272. PubMed ID: 34216707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A concise review of optical, physical and isotropic fractionator techniques in neuroscience studies, including recent developments.
Deniz ÖG; Altun G; Kaplan AA; Yurt KK; von Bartheld CS; Kaplan S
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Dec; 310():45-53. PubMed ID: 30048673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical disector counting in cryosections and vibratome sections underestimates particle numbers: effects of tissue quality.
Ward TS; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
Microsc Res Tech; 2008 Jan; 71(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 17868132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of the chick embryo: calibration of the optical disector counting method reveals systematic bias.
Hatton WJ; von Bartheld CS
J Comp Neurol; 1999 Jun; 409(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 10379913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What was wrong with the Abercrombie and empirical cell counting methods? A review.
Hedreen JC
Anat Rec; 1998 Mar; 250(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 9517854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The coefficient of error of optical fractionator population size estimates: a computer simulation comparing three estimators.
Glaser EM; Wilson PD
J Microsc; 1998 Nov; 192(Pt 2):163-71. PubMed ID: 9853373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design-based estimation of neuronal number and individual neuronal volume in the rat hippocampus.
Hosseini-Sharifabad M; Nyengaard JR
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 May; 162(1-2):206-14. PubMed ID: 17368561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of absolute microglial cell numbers in mouse fascia dentata using unbiased and efficient stereological cell counting principles.
Wirenfeldt M; Dalmau I; Finsen B
Glia; 2003 Nov; 44(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 14515329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
