These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26371084)

  • 21. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computed tomography dose index for head CT in northern Nigeria.
    Garba I; Engel-Hills P; Davidson F; Tabari AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):98-101. PubMed ID: 25889610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for common multi-detector computed tomography examinations in Iran.
    Najafi M; Deevband MR; Ahmadi M; Kardan MR
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26507898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conversion factors for determining organ doses received by paediatric patients in high-resolution single slice computed tomography with narrow collimation.
    Seidenbusch MC; Harder D; Regulla DF; Schneider K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 24630933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survey of computed tomography scanners in Taiwan: dose descriptors, dose guidance levels, and effective doses.
    Tsai HY; Tung CJ; Yu CC; Tyan YS
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17500455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Organ localization: toward prospective patient-specific organ dosimetry in computed tomography.
    Segars WP; Rybicki K; Norris H; Frush D; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121908. PubMed ID: 25471968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new shielding calculation method for X-ray computed tomography regarding scattered radiation.
    Watanabe H; Noto K; Shohji T; Ogawa Y; Fujibuchi T; Yamaguchi I; Hiraki H; Kida T; Sasanuma K; Katsunuma Y; Nakano T; Horitsugi G; Hosono M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 28025782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume.
    Gosling O; Loader R; Venables P; Rowles N; Morgan-Hughes G; Roobottom C
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1013-7. PubMed ID: 21070906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
    van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.
    Van der Molen AJ; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):248-55. PubMed ID: 17038410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of different methods of calculating CT radiation effective dose in children.
    Newman B; Ganguly A; Kim JE; Robinson T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W232-9. PubMed ID: 22826426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cloud-Based CT Dose Monitoring using the DICOM-Structured Report: Fully Automated Analysis in Regard to National Diagnostic Reference Levels.
    Boos J; Meineke A; Rubbert C; Heusch P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Antoch G; Kröpil P
    Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 26632871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Survey of clinical doses from computed tomography examinations in the Canadian province of Manitoba.
    A Elbakri I; D C Kirkpatrick I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):525-35. PubMed ID: 23803227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experiences of using a commercial dose management system (GE DoseWatch) for CT examinations.
    Nicol RM; Wayte SC; Bridges AJ; Koller CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1057):20150617. PubMed ID: 26539632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing emergency CT radiation doses with simple techniques: A quality initiative project.
    Sulagaesuan C; Saksobhavivat N; Asavaphatiboon S; Kaewlai R
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Feb; 60(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 26597510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT with Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software.
    MacGregor K; Li I; Dowdell T; Gray BG
    Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):507-17. PubMed ID: 25897474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation dose at cardiac computed tomography: facts and fiction.
    Huda W; Rowlett WT; Schoepf UJ
    J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Aug; 25(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 20711036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiation dose assessment in a 320-detector-row CT scanner used in cardiac imaging.
    Gomà C; Ruiz A; Jornet N; Latorre A; Pallerol RM; Carrasco P; Eudaldo T; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 21520859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. AP diameter shows the strongest correlation with CTDI and DLP in abdominal and chest CT.
    Zarb F; Rainford L; McEntee MF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 20332128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT.
    Hidajat N; Mäurer J; Schröder RJ; Nunnemann A; Wolf M; Pauli K; Felix R
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):556-61. PubMed ID: 10560337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.