BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26371881)

  • 1. Differential impact of emotional task relevance on three indices of prioritised processing for fearful and angry facial expressions.
    Engen HG; Smallwood J; Singer T
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):175-184. PubMed ID: 26371881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fearful, but not angry, expressions diffuse attention to peripheral targets in an attentional blink paradigm.
    Taylor JM; Whalen PJ
    Emotion; 2014 Jun; 14(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 24708498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectation modulates the preferential processing of task-irrelevant fear in the attentional blink: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Sun M; Shang C; Jia X; Liu F; Cui L; Wei P; Zhang Q
    Behav Brain Funct; 2022 Dec; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 36517847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is modulated by emotional task relevance: An event-related potential study.
    Sun M; Liu F; Cui L; Wei P; Zhang Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108043. PubMed ID: 34600892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional allocation to task-irrelevant fearful faces is not automatic: experimental evidence for the conditional hypothesis of emotional selection.
    Victeur Q; Huguet P; Silvert L
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Mar; 34(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 31130091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
    Aguado L; Martínez-García N; Solís-Olce A; Dieguez-Risco T; Hinojosa JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():66-76. PubMed ID: 29751931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.
    Vermeulen N; Godefroid J; Mermillod M
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7924. PubMed ID: 19936235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal processing of emotional stimuli: the capture and release of attention by angry faces.
    Maratos FA
    Emotion; 2011 Oct; 11(5):1242-7. PubMed ID: 21942702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fearful expressions of rapidly presented hybrid-faces modulate the lag 1 sparing in the attentional blink.
    Pecchinenda A; Monachesi B; Laeng B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103124. PubMed ID: 32603914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive effects between gaze direction and facial expression on attentional resources deployment: the task instruction and context matter.
    Ricciardelli P; Lugli L; Pellicano A; Iani C; Nicoletti R
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21706. PubMed ID: 26898473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial expression influences face identity recognition during the attentional blink.
    Bach DR; Schmidt-Daffy M; Dolan RJ
    Emotion; 2014 Dec; 14(6):1007-13. PubMed ID: 25286076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward and emotion influence attentional bias in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Luque D; Most SB; Fernández-Berrocal P; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2155-2167. PubMed ID: 30862249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrocortical responses to NIMSTIM facial expressions of emotion.
    Smith E; Weinberg A; Moran T; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23280304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of stimulus sex and emotional expression on the attentional blink.
    Stebbins HE; Vanous JB
    Emotion; 2015 Aug; 15(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 26098728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of emotions on temporal attention.
    Mishra MV; Ray SB; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 236():287-309. PubMed ID: 29157417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faces are special, but facial expressions aren't: Insights from an oculomotor capture paradigm.
    Devue C; Grimshaw GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1438-1452. PubMed ID: 28451999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A tale of two negatives: differential memory modulation by threat-related facial expressions.
    Davis FC; Somerville LH; Ruberry EJ; Berry AB; Shin LM; Whalen PJ
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 21668114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of emotional faces on younger and older adults' attentional blink.
    Sklenar AM; Mienaltowski A
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1436-1447. PubMed ID: 30714505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotional modulation of the attentional blink is awareness-dependent.
    Qian W; Meng Q; Chen L; Zhou K
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46394. PubMed ID: 23029507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.