342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26372266)
1. The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.
Picou EM; Gordon J; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Critical Distance and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults.
Huang H; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BWY; Picou EM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 65(12):4837-4851. PubMed ID: 36351258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children.
Hsu BC; Vanpoucke F; van Wieringen A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28399062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Child-Adult Differences in Using Dual-Task Paradigms to Measure Listening Effort.
Picou EM; Charles LM; Ricketts TA
Am J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 26(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 28346816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Slight Increase in Reverberation Time in the Classroom Affects Performance and Behavioral Listening Effort.
Prodi N; Visentin C
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):460-476. PubMed ID: 34369418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative Effect of Acoustic Panels on Listening Effort in a Classroom Environment.
Amlani AM; Russo TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):805-815. PubMed ID: 27885976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech recognition and listening effort for older adults.
Kwak C; Han W; Lee J; Kim J; Kim S
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2018 Dec; 18(12):1603-1608. PubMed ID: 30328231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.
Hughes KC; Galvin KL
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 23540588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
Bertoli S; Bodmer D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
