These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26373026)
1. The Teeth-Whitening Debacle. Plunkett L N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):4-7. PubMed ID: 26373026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court ruling may determine the future of state-based professionai licensing. Owsiany DJ J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25975126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Closer Look at the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners and Who Can Practice Dentistry. Parker MA J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):12-7. PubMed ID: 26697649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FTC rules against North Carolina on teeth whitening. Schulte D J Mich Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 94(2):18. PubMed ID: 22720494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State Dental Boards Are Not Immune from Antitrust Liability. Schulte DJ J Mich Dent Assoc; 2015 Apr; 97(4):22, 73. PubMed ID: 26268002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A License to Labor. Weiss S State Legis; 2017 Jan; 43(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 28117565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who Gets to Whiten Teeth? Hanley KJ N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 27348941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The FTC's case against the North Carolina Dental Board should not impact the Michigan Board of Medicine. Schulte DJ Mich Med; 2012; 111(6):4. PubMed ID: 23362681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Battle not over: FTC wants Supreme Court to review Palmyra case. Carlson J Mod Healthc; 2012 Mar; 42(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 22458067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Spurned in Texas. Supreme court rejects group's price-fix challenge. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2009 Mar; 39(9):14. PubMed ID: 19291851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The wake of FTC v. Actavis: practical implications on the pharmaceutical industry. Ritter M; Tempesta J; Ragusa P Pharm Pat Anal; 2014 Jul; 3(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 25291307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What Contract? With Whom? For What Purpose? DeFriese GH J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 26697651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reanalyzing reverse payment settlements: a solution to the patentee's dilemma. Wang Z Cornell Law Rev; 2014 Jul; 99(5):1227-58. PubMed ID: 25112001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. High court wary about dental board's antitrust exemption. Schencker L Mod Healthc; 2014 Oct; 44(42):17. PubMed ID: 25509606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How Will the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in North Carolina Dental Affect the Regulation of the Professions? LeBuhn R J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26697650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Words can bite back. Lamacki W CDS Rev; 2015; 108(3):44. PubMed ID: 26058302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An FDA Legal Grab Bag: Severe Weather, a U.S. Supreme Court Slip Opinion, Working Interviews, Board of Pharmacy Fines and Patient Abandonment. Nicol G Todays FDA; 2015; 27(3):6-7, 9. PubMed ID: 26523306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]