These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26373803)
1. Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas. Caselle JE; Rassweiler A; Hamilton SL; Warner RR Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14102. PubMed ID: 26373803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems. Smith JG; Free CM; Lopazanski C; Brun J; Anderson CR; Carr MH; Claudet J; Dugan JE; Eurich JG; Francis TB; Hamilton SL; Mouillot D; Raimondi PT; Starr RM; Ziegler SL; Nickols KJ; Caselle JE Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Oct; 29(19):5634-5651. PubMed ID: 37439293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large-scale, multidecade monitoring data from kelp forest ecosystems in California and Oregon (USA). Malone DP; Davis K; Lonhart SI; Parsons-Field A; Caselle JE; Carr MH Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3630. PubMed ID: 35048367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs. Tetreault I; Ambrose RF Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No-take marine protected areas enhance the benefits of kelp-forest restoration for fish but not fisheries. Hopf JK; Caselle JE; White JW Ecol Lett; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 35596734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the relationships between marine protected areas and invasive fish in the world's most invaded sea. Giakoumi S; Pey A; Di Franco A; Francour P; Kizilkaya Z; Arda Y; Raybaud V; Guidetti P Ecol Appl; 2019 Jan; 29(1):e01809. PubMed ID: 30325075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network. Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Willis TJ; Kininmonth S; Baker SC; Banks S; Barrett NS; Becerro MA; Bernard AT; Berkhout J; Buxton CD; Campbell SJ; Cooper AT; Davey M; Edgar SC; Försterra G; Galván DE; Irigoyen AJ; Kushner DJ; Moura R; Parnell PE; Shears NT; Soler G; Strain EM; Thomson RJ Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7487):216-20. PubMed ID: 24499817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Global expansion of marine protected areas and the redistribution of fishing effort. McDonald G; Bone J; Costello C; Englander G; Raynor J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jul; 121(29):e2400592121. PubMed ID: 38980905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value. Chirico AAD; McClanahan TR; Eklöf JS PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182342. PubMed ID: 28806740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Habitat continuity effects on gradients of fish biomass across marine protected area boundaries. Forcada A; Bayle-Sempere JT; Valle C; Sánchez-Jerez P Mar Environ Res; 2008 Dec; 66(5):536-47. PubMed ID: 18829099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests. Hamilton SL; Caselle JE Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1799):20141817. PubMed ID: 25500572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marine protected areas increase temporal stability of community structure, but not density or diversity, of tropical seagrass fish communities. Alonso Aller E; Jiddawi NS; Eklöf JS PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183999. PubMed ID: 28854231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trophic cascades induced by lobster fishing are not ubiquitous in southern California kelp forests. Guenther CM; Lenihan HS; Grant LE; Lopez-Carr D; Reed DC PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49396. PubMed ID: 23209573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of protection and temperature variation on temporal stability in a marine reserve network. Srednick G; Swearer SE Conserv Biol; 2024 Jun; 38(3):e14220. PubMed ID: 37937466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing efficiency and resilience of no-take marine protected areas for fish conservation under climate change along the coastlines of China Seas. Lin L; Liu Y; Yan Y; Kang B Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14174. PubMed ID: 37650435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in responses of fishes across multiple reserves within a network of marine protected areas in temperate waters. Starr RM; Wendt DE; Barnes CL; Marks CI; Malone D; Waltz G; Schmidt KT; Chiu J; Launer AL; Hall NC; Yochum N PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118502. PubMed ID: 25760856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploited reefs protected from fishing transform over decades into conservation features otherwise absent from seascapes. Edgar GJ; Barrett NS; Stuart-Smith RD Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):1967-74. PubMed ID: 20014571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning. Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracking the response of industrial fishing fleets to large marine protected areas in the Pacific Ocean. White TD; Ong T; Ferretti F; Block BA; McCauley DJ; Micheli F; De Leo GA Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1571-1578. PubMed ID: 33031635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]