These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26374331)

  • 1. No source memory for unrecognized items when implicit feedback is avoided.
    Malejka S; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26374331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source memory for unidentified stimuli.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 20192538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of response bias and internal/external source on lateral posterior parietal successful retrieval activity.
    King DR; Miller MB
    Cortex; 2017 Jun; 91():126-141. PubMed ID: 28499558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial Recall: Feature-Conjunction Effects in Source Retrieval Versus Item Recognition.
    Nie A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):369-386. PubMed ID: 29307254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A word of warning: Instructions and feedback cannot prevent the revelation effect.
    Aßfalg A; Nadarevic L
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Jul; 34():75-86. PubMed ID: 25881234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing single- and dual-process models of memory development.
    Hayes BK; Dunn JC; Joubert A; Taylor R
    Dev Sci; 2017 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 27659763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impairment of source memory in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: equivalent current dipole analysis.
    Kim YY; Roh AY; Yoo SY; Kang DH; Kwon JS
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jan; 165(1-2):47-59. PubMed ID: 19027963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition: A discrete-state approach.
    Klauer KC; Kellen D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):465-78. PubMed ID: 20702864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
    Huff MJ; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminating famous from fictional names based on lifetime experience: evidence in support of a signal-detection model based on finite mixture distributions.
    Bowles B; Harlow IM; Meeking MM; Köhler S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 21910561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials.
    Sikström S; Hellman J; Dahl M; Stenberg G; Johansson M
    Cogn Process; 2018 Nov; 19(4):481-494. PubMed ID: 29679290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Von Hecker U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1015-40. PubMed ID: 17616917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition memory zROC slopes for items with correct versus incorrect source decisions discriminate the dual process and unequal variance signal detection models.
    Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1205-25. PubMed ID: 24820667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent retrieval of source dimensions: an extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure.
    Vogt V; Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):443-50. PubMed ID: 17352624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source monitoring and proneness to auditory-verbal hallucinations: a signal detection analysis.
    McKague M; McAnally KI; Skovron M; Bendall S; Jackson HJ
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2012 Nov; 17(6):544-62. PubMed ID: 22571352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory and the memory distortion component of hindsight bias.
    Calvillo DP
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):891-8. PubMed ID: 22871160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.