164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26374339)
1. Effect of the laryngeal tube on the no-flow-time in a simulated two rescuer basic life support setting with inexperienced users.
Schröder J; Bucher M; Meyer O
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2016 Sep; 111(6):493-500. PubMed ID: 26374339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of using a laryngeal tube on the no-flow time in a simulated, single-rescuer, basic life support setting with inexperienced users.
Meyer O; Bucher M; Schröder J
Anaesthesist; 2016 Mar; 65(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26886383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses - a single rescuer resuscitation manikin study.
Wiese CH; Bartels U; Schultens A; Steffen T; Torney A; Bahr J; Graf BM
BMC Emerg Med; 2008 Apr; 8():4. PubMed ID: 18402652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a laryngeal tube suction-device (LTS-D) reduces the "no flow time" in a single rescuer manikin study.
Wiese CH; Bartels U; Schultens A; Steffen T; Torney A; Bahr J; Graf BM
J Emerg Med; 2011 Aug; 41(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19217236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reduction in no flow time using a laryngeal tube: comparison to bag-mask ventilation].
Wiese CH; Bahr J; Bergmann A; Bergmann I; Bartels U; Graf BM
Anaesthesist; 2008 Jun; 57(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 18338138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ["Laryngeal Tube-D" (LT-D) and "Laryngeal Mask" (LMA)].
Wiese CH; Bahr J; Graf BM
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Jan; 134(3):69-74. PubMed ID: 19085741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in time to defibrillation and intubation between two different ventilation/compression ratios in simulated cardiac arrest.
Kill C; Giesel M; Eberhart L; Geldner G; Wulf H
Resuscitation; 2005 Apr; 65(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15797274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is superior to mouth-to-pocket mask and bag-valve-mask ventilation during lifeguard CPR: a randomized study.
Adelborg K; Dalgas C; Grove EL; Jørgensen C; Al-Mashhadi RH; Løfgren B
Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):618-22. PubMed ID: 21330044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube.
Wiese CH; Bartels U; Bergmann A; Bergmann I; Bahr J; Graf BM
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2008; 120(7-8):217-23. PubMed ID: 18500596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the laryngeal tube for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Hinkelbein J; Schmitz J; Mathes A; DE Robertis E
Minerva Anestesiol; 2021 May; 87(5):580-590. PubMed ID: 33300320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of chest compressions during 10min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model.
Bjørshol CA; Søreide E; Torsteinbø TH; Lexow K; Nilsen OB; Sunde K
Resuscitation; 2008 Apr; 77(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18207627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of Laryngeal Tube versus Bag Mask Ventilation by Inexperienced Providers.
Hart D; Driver B; Kartha G; Reardon R; Miner J
West J Emerg Med; 2020 Apr; 21(3):688-693. PubMed ID: 32421521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study.
Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H
Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest compression fraction in simulated cardiac arrest management by primary care paramedics: King laryngeal tube airway versus basic airway management.
Jensen JL; Walker M; LeRoux Y; Carter A
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 23305613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The laryngeal tube - a helpful tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the dental office?
Keilholz G; Mutzbauer TS
Br Dent J; 2015 May; 218(9):E15. PubMed ID: 25952455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved basic life support performance by ward nurses using the CAREvent Public Access Resuscitator (PAR) in a simulated setting.
Monsieurs KG; De Regge M; Vogels C; Calle PA
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 16129540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study.
Fischer H; Neuhold S; Zapletal B; Hochbrugger E; Koinig H; Steinlechner B; Frantal S; Stumpf D; Greif R
Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):913-9. PubMed ID: 21444144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.
American Heart Association
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e989-1004. PubMed ID: 16651298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing no-flow time during endotracheal intubation versus placement of a laryngeal mask airway during a simulated cardiac arrest scenario.
Miller VJ; Flaherty EE
Simul Healthc; 2014 Jun; 9(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 24310162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway achieves faster insertion times than Classic LMA during chest compressions in manikins.
Chloros T; Xanthos T; Iacovidou N; Bassiakou E
Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 32(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 24332907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
