These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26374396)

  • 1. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27875937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of adaptable automation: Effects of extended skill lay-off and changes in system reliability.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():471-481. PubMed ID: 27633244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA; Lacson FC
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 16884046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting a Single Automation Failure: The Impact of Expected (But Not Experienced) Automation Reliability.
    Bowden VK; Griffiths N; Strickland L; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 34375538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Modeling and Simulation to Predict Operator Performance and Automation-Induced Complacency With Robotic Automation: A Case Study and Empirical Validation.
    Wickens CD; Sebok A; Li H; Sarter N; Gacy AM
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):959-75. PubMed ID: 25850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation.
    Wickens CD; Clegg BA; Vieane AZ; Sebok AL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):728-39. PubMed ID: 25886768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near-Perfect Automation: Investigating Performance, Trust, and Visual Attention Allocation.
    Foroughi CK; Devlin S; Pak R; Brown NL; Sibley C; Coyne JT
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):546-561. PubMed ID: 34348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human performance consequences of automated decision aids in states of sleep loss.
    Reichenbach J; Onnasch L; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 22235532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.