266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26374612)
1. Bactericidal effects of triclosan in soap both in vitro and in vivo.
Kim SA; Moon H; Lee K; Rhee MS
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2015 Dec; 70(12):3345-52. PubMed ID: 26374612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid antibacterial activity of 2 novel hand soaps: evaluation of the risk of development of bacterial resistance to the antibacterial agents.
Geraldo IM; Gilman A; Shintre MS; Modak SM
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 29(8):736-41. PubMed ID: 18616390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbicidal effects of plain soap vs triclocarban-based antibacterial soap.
Kim SA; Rhee MS
J Hosp Infect; 2016 Nov; 94(3):276-280. PubMed ID: 27585555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the immediate, residual, and cumulative antibacterial effects of Novaderm R,* Novascrub R,* Betadine Surgical Scrub, Hibiclens, and liquid soap.
Faoagali J; Fong J; George N; Mahoney P; O'Rourke V
Am J Infect Control; 1995 Dec; 23(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 8821108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serratia marcescens contamination of antiseptic soap containing triclosan: implications for nosocomial infection.
Barry MA; Craven DE; Goularte TA; Lichtenberg DA
Infect Control; 1984 Sep; 5(9):427-30. PubMed ID: 6436187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.
Oughton MT; Loo VG; Dendukuri N; Fenn S; Libman MD
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 30(10):939-44. PubMed ID: 19715426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer antibacterial soaps: effective or just risky?
Aiello AE; Larson EL; Levy SB
Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Sep; 45 Suppl 2():S137-47. PubMed ID: 17683018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of risk reduction from hand washing with antibacterial soaps.
Gibson LL; Rose JB; Haas CN; Gerba CP; Rusin PA
J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 92 Suppl():136S-43S. PubMed ID: 12000622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Soap Characteristics and Food Service Facility Type on the Degree of Bacterial Contamination of Open, Refillable Bulk Soaps.
Schaffner DW; Jensen D; Gerba CP; Shumaker D; Arbogast JW
J Food Prot; 2018 Feb; 81(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29320234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative assessment of risk reduction from hand washing with antibacterial soaps.
Gibson LL; Rose JB; Haas CN; Gerba CP; Rusin PA
Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol; 2002; (31):136S-143S. PubMed ID: 12481838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hand hygiene antimicrobial efficacy: Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil versus triclosan.
Gnatta JR; Pinto FM; Bruna CQ; Souza RQ; Graziano KU; Silva MJ
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2013; 21(6):1212-9. PubMed ID: 24402336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Removal of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis after Hand Washing with Antimicrobial and Nonantimicrobial Soap and Persistence of These Bacteria in Rinsates.
Pérez-Garza J; García S; Heredia N
J Food Prot; 2017 Oct; 80(10):1670-1675. PubMed ID: 28876132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative susceptibility of resident and transient hand bacteria to para-chloro-meta-xylenol and triclosan.
Johnson SA; Goddard PA; Iliffe C; Timmins B; Rickard AH; Robson G; Handley PS
J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 93(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 12147083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Microbiological characteristics of selected liquid soaps for hands washing].
Tyski S; Bocian E; Zawistowska A; Mrówka A; Kruszewska H; Grzybowska W; Zareba T
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2013; 65(3):207-26. PubMed ID: 24432560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Update on antibacterial soaps: the FDA takes a second look at triclosans.
Bergstrom KG
J Drugs Dermatol; 2014 Apr; 13(4):501-3. PubMed ID: 24719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The handiwork of good health. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are more effective than antibacterial soaps, but don't give up on plain soap and water.
Harv Health Lett; 2007 Jan; 32(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 17323497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the skin disinfecting activity and cumulative effect of chlorhexidine and triclosan handwash preparations on hands artificially contaminated with Serratia marcescens.
Bartzokas CA; Corkill JE; Makin T
Infect Control; 1987 Apr; 8(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 3294700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of triclosan as an antimicrobial hand soap and its potential impact on antimicrobial resistance: a focused review.
Giuliano CA; Rybak MJ
Pharmacotherapy; 2015 Mar; 35(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25809180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Triclosen and Its Alternatives in Antibacterial Soaps.
Rundle CW; Hu S; Presley CL; Dunnick CA
Dermatitis; 2019; 30(6):352-357. PubMed ID: 31688130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
