These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Adaptability of composite resin inlays. 1. Adaptability to the experimental MOD cavity prepared in an acrylic block]. Suzuki T; Hosoki S; Wakumoto S Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 2134823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Young HL; Suzuki S Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10477999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. Terry DA; Touati B Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):129-35. PubMed ID: 2216905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials. Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of bonded composite inlays. Nilsson E; Alaeddin S; Karlsson S; Milleding P; Wennerberg A Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 11203610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Krejci I; Güntert A; Lutz F Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 7938428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Establishment of a composite resin inlay technique. Part 1. The effects of various curing modes on mechanical properties of composite resins]. Hosoda H; Kimoto T; Yamada T; Harnirattisai C Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Mar; 8(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 2690393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. Attar N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]