These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26375260)

  • 1. Dispositional sources of sanction perceptions: Emotionality, cognitive style, intolerance of ambiguity, and self-efficacy.
    Pickett JT; Bushway SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):624-40. PubMed ID: 26375260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trait anger and anger expression style in children's risky decisions.
    Gambetti E; Giusberti F
    Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 18839406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians.
    Djulbegovic M; Beckstead J; Elqayam S; Reljic T; Kumar A; Paidas C; Djulbegovic B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134038. PubMed ID: 26241650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonrational processes in ethical decision making.
    Rogerson MD; Gottlieb MC; Handelsman MM; Knapp S; Younggren J
    Am Psychol; 2011 Oct; 66(7):614-23. PubMed ID: 21875170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disgust and biological descriptions bias logical reasoning during legal decision-making.
    Capestany BH; Harris LT
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 24571553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Physicians' Cognitive Styles.
    Djulbegovic B; Beckstead JW; Elqayam S; Reljic T; Hozo I; Kumar A; Cannon-Bowers J; Taylor S; Tsalatsanis A; Turner B; Paidas C
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 24722474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.
    Han PK; Moser RP; Klein WM
    J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 1(0 1):51-69. PubMed ID: 16641074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.
    Laurent SM; Clark BA; Walker S; Wiseman KD
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 23725235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.
    Kaplan BJ; Shayne VT
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1993; 5(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 8297709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
    Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mindful judgment and decision making.
    Weber EU; Johnson EJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():53-85. PubMed ID: 18798706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brutality under cover of ambiguity: activating, perpetuating, and deactivating covert retributivism.
    Fincher KM; Tetlock PE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 25758706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment.
    Paxton JM; Ungar L; Greene JD
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(1):163-77. PubMed ID: 22049931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field.
    Dimmock SG; Kouwenberg R; Mitchell OS; Peijnenburg K
    J Risk Uncertain; 2015 Dec; 51(3):219-244. PubMed ID: 26924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction.
    Simon D; Snow CJ; Read SJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jun; 86(6):814-37. PubMed ID: 15149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance.
    Schmidt AM; DeShon RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):572-81. PubMed ID: 20476834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.