These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. Salerno JM; Bottoms BL Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy. Reyna VF; Farley F Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. Han PK; Moser RP; Klein WM J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 1(0 1):51-69. PubMed ID: 16641074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors. Laurent SM; Clark BA; Walker S; Wiseman KD Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 23725235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry. Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease. Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mindful judgment and decision making. Weber EU; Johnson EJ Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():53-85. PubMed ID: 18798706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brutality under cover of ambiguity: activating, perpetuating, and deactivating covert retributivism. Fincher KM; Tetlock PE Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 25758706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders. Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Paxton JM; Ungar L; Greene JD Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(1):163-77. PubMed ID: 22049931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field. Dimmock SG; Kouwenberg R; Mitchell OS; Peijnenburg K J Risk Uncertain; 2015 Dec; 51(3):219-244. PubMed ID: 26924890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Simon D; Snow CJ; Read SJ J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jun; 86(6):814-37. PubMed ID: 15149257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Schmidt AM; DeShon RP J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):572-81. PubMed ID: 20476834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]