These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26375581)

  • 21. Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans
    Balliet D; Tybur JM; Wu J; Antonellis C; Van Lange PAM
    J Conflict Resolut; 2018 Apr; 62(4):797-818. PubMed ID: 29593363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
    Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Political (Meta-)Dehumanization in Mental Representations: Divergent Emphases in the Minds of Liberals Versus Conservatives.
    Petsko CD; Kteily NS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231180971. PubMed ID: 37415508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exposure to the American flag polarizes democratic-republican ideologies.
    Chan EY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Dec; 56(4):809-818. PubMed ID: 28419478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When values and attributions collide: liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds.
    Morgan GS; Mullen E; Skitka LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1241-54. PubMed ID: 20699405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Liberals think more analytically (more "WEIRD") than conservatives.
    Talhelm T; Haidt J; Oishi S; Zhang X; Miao FF; Chen S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Feb; 41(2):250-67. PubMed ID: 25540328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Putting Within-Country Political Differences in (Global) Perspective.
    Garcia-Rada X; Norton MI
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231794. PubMed ID: 32324745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception.
    van Baar JM; Halpern DJ; FeldmanHall O
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33986114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Political diversity will improve social psychological science.
    Duarte JL; Crawford JT; Stern C; Haidt J; Jussim L; Tetlock PE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e130. PubMed ID: 25036715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying Twitter influencer profiles for health promotion in Saudi Arabia.
    Albalawi Y; Sixsmith J
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Jun; 32(3):456-463. PubMed ID: 26516181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Social networking sites: emerging and essential tools for communication in dermatology.
    Amir M; Sampson BP; Endly D; Tamai JM; Henley J; Brewer AC; Dunn JH; Dunnick CA; Dellavalle RP
    JAMA Dermatol; 2014 Jan; 150(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 24196212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The political polarization of physicians in the United States: an analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012.
    Bonica A; Rosenthal H; Rothman DJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1308-17. PubMed ID: 24887456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conservatives negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to maintain a sense of certainty.
    Stern C; West TV; Rule NO
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(50):15337-42. PubMed ID: 26621712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.
    Rule NO; Ambady N
    PLoS One; 2010 Jan; 5(1):e8733. PubMed ID: 20090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization.
    Huber M; Van Boven L; Park B; Pizzi WT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139193. PubMed ID: 26407321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hurt on Both Sides: Political Differences in Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Coleman ME; Andersson MA
    J Health Soc Behav; 2024 Mar; 65(1):94-109. PubMed ID: 37864410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. People See Political Opponents as More Stupid Than Evil.
    Hartman R; Hester N; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1014-1027. PubMed ID: 35481435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.
    Hibbing JR; Smith KB; Alford JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Jun; 37(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 24970428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice.
    Badaan V; Hoffarth M; Roper C; Parker T; Jost JT
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22345. PubMed ID: 38102130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.