135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26375846)
1. A Trade-off Between Invasiveness and Efficacy: Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Commentary on: Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Shakeri A; Van Asseldonk B; Elterman DS
Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):850-1. PubMed ID: 26375846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Denstedt J; Welk B
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):540. PubMed ID: 26282357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why does anyone get shock wave lithotripsy?
Gore JL
JAMA Surg; 2014 Jul; 149(7):654. PubMed ID: 24839194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Scales CD; Lai JC; Dick AW; Hanley JM; van Meijgaard J; Setodji CM; Saigal CS;
JAMA Surg; 2014 Jul; 149(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 24839228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.
Schenkman NS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S74. PubMed ID: 18405760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of combining flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for transurethral lithotripsy.
Shigemura K; Yasufuku T; Yamashita M; Arakawa S; Fujisawa M
Kobe J Med Sci; 2010 Aug; 56(1):E24-8. PubMed ID: 21063143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
Ding J; Zhang Y; Cao Q; Huang T; Xu W; Huang K; Fang J; Bai Q; Qi J; Huang Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 26409427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies.
Hertzig LL; Iwaszko MR; Rangel LJ; Patterson DE; Gettman MT; Krambeck AE
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2152-7. PubMed ID: 23228383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones treatment].
Ravier E; Abid N; Ruffion A; Fassi-Fehri H; Buron C; Ganne C; Mallet A; Martin X
Prog Urol; 2015 Apr; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 25640027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis.
Ordon M; Urbach D; Mamdani M; Saskin R; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1450-6. PubMed ID: 24866599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Assimos DG
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1812-3. PubMed ID: 25280292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children's hospitals.
Wang HH; Huang L; Routh JC; Nelson CP
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1402-7. PubMed ID: 22341283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Adanur S; Ziypak T
Urolithiasis; 2014 Aug; 42(4):373. PubMed ID: 24840300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Sener NC; Imamoglu A; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug G; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Dec; 42(6):559. PubMed ID: 25113392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endoscopic techniques in the treatment of calculi in the upper urinary tract].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Oct; 116(24):2893-6. PubMed ID: 8975406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-Treatment after Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Population Based Comparative Effectiveness Study.
Bowen DK; Song L; Faerber J; Kim J; Scales CD; Tasian GE
J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1156-1162. PubMed ID: 31859598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management options for lower pole renal calculi.
Raman JD; Pearle MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18303547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
