131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26375888)
1. More noise does not mean more precision: A review of Aldenberg and Rorije (2013).
Fox DR
Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Sep; 43(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 26375888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.
Aldenberg T; Rorije E
Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
Hickey GL; Craig PS
Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles.
Crane M; Handy RD; Garrod J; Owen R
Ecotoxicology; 2008 Jul; 17(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 18438709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian methods for uncertainty factor application for derivation of reference values.
Simon TW; Zhu Y; Dourson ML; Beck NB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():9-24. PubMed ID: 27211295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID.
Bondarenko OM; Heinlaan M; Sihtmäe M; Ivask A; Kurvet I; Joonas E; Jemec A; Mannerström M; Heinonen T; Rekulapelly R; Singh S; Zou J; Pyykkö I; Drobne D; Kahru A
Nanotoxicology; 2016 Nov; 10(9):1229-42. PubMed ID: 27259032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 15th International Symposium on Toxicity Assessment : new directions in ecotoxicology and meeting the challenges ahead.
Au DW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2463-4. PubMed ID: 22678546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Do interspecies correlation estimations increase the reliability of toxicity estimates for wildlife?
Golsteijn L; Hendriks HW; van Zelm R; Ragas AM; Huijbregts MA
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2012 Jun; 80():238-43. PubMed ID: 22483638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Toxicogenomics in hazard assessment of chemicals].
Kostka G; Liszewska M; Urbanek-Olejnik K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2010; 61(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20839457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A toxicological basis to derive a generic interspecies uncertainty factor.
Calabrese EJ; Baldwin LA
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9721264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
Speijers GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxicological information on chemicals published in the Russian language: Contribution to REACH and 3Rs.
Sihtmäe M; Dubourguier HC; Kahru A
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 262(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19433131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology.
Ashauer R; Jager T
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29090718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and strategic use of alternative tests in assessing the hazard of chemicals.
Purchase IF
Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1998; 20():71-80. PubMed ID: 9442283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial: Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment.
van Ravenzwaay B; Sauer UG; de Matos O; Poole A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91 Suppl 1():S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29246668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals].
Novikov SM; Shashina TA
Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
Fox DR; Billoir E
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
