156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26376533)
1. Agreement between colposcopy results using the Reid Colposcopic Index and histopathology.
Kaban I; Cengiz H; Kaban A; Yildiz S; Ekin M; Avci E
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Jul; 86(7):537-40. PubMed ID: 26376533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of colposcopy using Reid colposcopic index with histopathology- a prospective study.
Durdi GS; Sherigar BY; Dalal AM; Desai BR; Malur PR
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2009; 10(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 24591873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective study to evaluate the correlation between Reid colposcopic index impression and biopsy histology.
Mousavi AS; Fakour F; Gilani MM; Behtash N; Ghaemmaghami F; Karimi Zarchi M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 17596759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptable predictive accuracy of histopathology results by colposcopy done by Gynecology residents using Reid index.
Shojaei H; Yarandi F; Ghozati L; Yarandi N; Izadi-Mood N; Eftekhar Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 23001366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.
Massad LS; Collins YC
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jun; 89(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 12798706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the abbreviated Reid colposcopic index in prediction of high-grade lesions.
Boonlikit S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 27085982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reid Colposcopic Index Evaluation: Comparison of General and Oncologic Gynecologists.
Aue-Aungkul A; Suprasert P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):5001-4. PubMed ID: 26163630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Hu S; Zhang X; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 21436729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between colposcopy and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in cervical precancerous lesions.
Boicea A; Pătraşcu A; Surlin V; Iliescu D; Schenker M; Chiuţu L
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(3 Suppl):735-41. PubMed ID: 23188433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopic evaluation of pre-invasive and early cervical carcinoma with histologic correlation.
Shahida SM; Mirza TT; Saleh AF; Islam MA
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Apr; 21(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22561759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Katki HA; Schiffman M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19550210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colposcopic scoring indexes in the evaluation of cervical lesions with the cytological result of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade lesion.
Kudela E; Laucekova Z; Nachajova M; Visnovsky J; Bielik T; Krivus S; Biringer K; Balharek T; Zubor P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):314-319. PubMed ID: 31814228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colposcopic analysis of cervical lesions using popular scoring systems: Reid versus Swede.
Safoorah A; Kanagal D; D'Cunha P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Nov; 304(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 34432109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
Yang B; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang X; Burchette R; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18485462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
