185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26376753)
1. Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.
Holm IA; Iles BR; Ziniel SI; Bacon PL; Savage SK; Christensen KD; Weitzman ER; Green RC; Huntington NL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):414-26. PubMed ID: 26376753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancing Autonomy in Biobank Decisions: Too Much of a Good Thing?
Mitchell PB; Ziniel SI; Savage SK; Christensen KD; Weitzman ER; Green RC; Huntington NL; Mathews DJ; Holm IA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Apr; 13(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 29471711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Christensen KD; Savage SK; Huntington NL; Weitzman ER; Ziniel SI; Bacon PL; Cacioppo CN; Green RC; Holm IA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Apr; 12(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 28421887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Bacon PL; Harris ED; Ziniel SI; Savage SK; Weitzman ER; Green RC; Huntington NL; Holm IA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 25742675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Harris ED; Ziniel SI; Amatruda JG; Clinton CM; Savage SK; Taylor PL; Huntington NL; Green RC; Holm IA
Genet Med; 2012 Mar; 14(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 22241099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Yamamoto K; Hachiya T; Fukushima A; Nakaya N; Okayama A; Tanno K; Aizawa F; Tokutomi T; Hozawa A; Shimizu A
J Hum Genet; 2017 Dec; 62(12):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 28794501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries.
Richards JE; Bane E; Fullerton SM; Ludman EJ; Jarvik G
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Oct; 11(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 27613778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
McGowan ML; Prows CA; DeJonckheere M; Brinkman WB; Vaughn L; Myers MF
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):371-382. PubMed ID: 29806518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.
Breitkopf CR; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Chaffee KG; Robinson ME; Gordon DR; Lindor NM; Koenig BA
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 26479556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.
Holm IA; Savage SK; Green RC; Juengst E; McGuire A; Kornetsky S; Brewster SJ; Joffe S; Taylor P
Genet Med; 2014 Jul; 16(7):547-52. PubMed ID: 24406460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping the inputs, analyses, and outputs of biobank research systems to identify sources of incidental findings and individual research results for potential return to participants.
Bemmels HR; Wolf SM; Van Ness B
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 22382801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives from Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks.
Petersen GM; Van Ness B
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 26479561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.
Fleming J; Critchley C; Otlowski M; Stewart C; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2015 Dec; 45(12):1274-9. PubMed ID: 26390363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disclosure of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Biobank Research: Why We Need an Evidence-based Approach.
Fleming J; Otlowski M; Stewart C; Critchley C; Kerridge I
J Law Med; 2016; 24(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 30136776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opinions of Adolescents and Parents About Pediatric Biobanking.
Kong CC; Tarling TE; Strahlendorf C; Dittrick M; Vercauteren SM
J Adolesc Health; 2016 Apr; 58(4):474-480. PubMed ID: 27013273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Kulchak Rahm A; Bailey L; Fultz K; Fan A; Williams JL; Buchanan A; Davis FD; Murray MF; Williams MS
Transl Behav Med; 2018 Jan; 8(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29385584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
Ziniel SI; Savage SK; Huntington N; Amatruda J; Green RC; Weitzman ER; Taylor P; Holm IA
Public Health Genomics; 2014; 17(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 24642506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Communicating with biobank participants: preferences for receiving and providing updates to researchers.
Mester JL; Mercer M; Goldenberg A; Moore RA; Eng C; Sharp RR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Apr; 24(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 25597748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
