BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26376882)

  • 1. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI versus the combination of unenhanced MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Girometti R; Marconi V; Linda A; Di Mico L; Bondini F; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():174-182. PubMed ID: 31838292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography.
    Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Wicklein J; Mertelmeier T; Windfuhr-Blum M; Langer M
    Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI.
    Förnvik D; Kataoka M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3194-3203. PubMed ID: 29460074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
    Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Carbonaro LA; Pancot M; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2830-9. PubMed ID: 25903704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
    Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
    Kim KW; Kuzmiak CM; Kim YJ; Seo JY; Jung HK; Lee MS
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 29339079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
    Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
    Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.