449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26376882)
21. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus MRI as an Adjunct to Full-Field Digital Mammography for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer according to Mammographic Density.
Kim H; Yang SY; Ahn JH; Ko EY; Ko ES; Han BK; Choi JS
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 36126953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis.
Ohashi R; Nagao M; Nakamura I; Okamoto T; Sakai S
Breast Cancer; 2018 Sep; 25(5):590-596. PubMed ID: 29651638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer.
Kim MY; Suh YJ; An YY
Acad Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1458-1465. PubMed ID: 35033452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.
Sumkin JH; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Catullo VJ; Zuley ML; Shinde DD; Hakim CM; Bandos AI; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 26391857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Park J; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Choi YW; Kim HH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():261-268. PubMed ID: 30396666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of noncalcified breast cancer in patients with extremely dense breasts using digital breast tomosynthesis compared with full-field digital mammography.
Yi A; Chang JM; Shin SU; Chu AJ; Cho N; Noh DY; Moon WK
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180101. PubMed ID: 30235008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.
Svahn TM; Chakraborty DP; Ikeda D; Zackrisson S; Do Y; Mattsson S; Andersson I
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):e1074-82. PubMed ID: 22674710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
