131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26377491)
1. Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Tachibana H; Iida S; Kondo T; Fukuda H; Takagi T; Iizuka J; Hashimoto Y; Tanabe K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Nov; 47(11):1763-9. PubMed ID: 26377491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drain placement can be safely omitted after the majority of robotic partial nephrectomies.
Abaza R; Prall D
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):823-7. PubMed ID: 23009869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Perioperative Variables That Predict the Need for Surgical Drains Following Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Utilizing Quantitative Drain Creatinine Analysis.
Williams RD; Snowden C; Thiel DD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Jan; 27(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 27583580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative drainage does not prevent complications after robotic partial nephrectomy.
Peyronnet B; Pradère B; De La Taille A; Bruyère F; Doumerc N; Droupy S; Vaessen C; Baumert H; Bernhard JC; Rouprêt M; Mejean A; Bensalah K
World J Urol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 26511751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor enucleation vs sharp excision in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: technical benefit without impact on functional or oncologic outcomes.
Mukkamala A; Allam CL; Ellison JS; Hafez KS; Miller DC; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Wolf JS
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1294-9. PubMed ID: 24713137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial.
Kriegmair MC; Mandel P; Krombach P; Dönmez H; John A; Häcker A; Michel MS
Int J Urol; 2016 May; 23(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 26890474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.
Desai MM; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Cai J; Huang EY; Lewandowski PM; Lee D; Dharmaraja A; Berger AK; Goh A; Ukimura O; Aron M; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 24486306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.
Komninos C; Shin TY; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Koo KC; Chang CH; Kim SW; Ha JY; Han WK; Rha KH
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 24275311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?
Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Renal sinus exposure as an independent factor predicting asymptomatic unruptured pseudoaneurysm formation detected in the early postoperative period after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Omae K; Kondo T; Takagi T; Morita S; Hashimoto Y; Kobayashi H; Iizuka J; Nozaki T; Yoshida K; Tanabe K
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 25581594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).
Jang HJ; Song W; Suh YS; Jeong US; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):808-13. PubMed ID: 25512815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence and risk factors for 30-day readmission in patients undergoing nephrectomy procedures: a contemporary analysis of 5276 cases from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
Autorino R; Zargar H; Butler S; Laydner H; Kaouk JH
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 25681252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine drain placement after partial nephrectomy is not always necessary.
Godoy G; Katz DJ; Adamy A; Jamal JE; Bernstein M; Russo P
J Urol; 2011 Aug; 186(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 21683403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A propensity score-matched comparison of surgical precision obtained by using volumetric analysis between robot-assisted laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective non-randomized observational study of initial outcomes.
Takagi T; Kondo T; Tachibana H; Iizuka J; Omae K; Kobayashi H; Yoshida K; Hashimoto Y; Tanabe K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1585-91. PubMed ID: 27262849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An obese body habitus does not preclude a minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Reynolds C; Hannon M; Lehman K; Harpster LE; Raman JD
Can J Urol; 2014 Feb; 21(1):7145-9. PubMed ID: 24529018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study.
Flippo B; Stone B; Stahr S; Khalil M; Davis R; Kamel M; Singh M
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jan; 6(1):e19750. PubMed ID: 35006078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors and management of urine leaks after partial nephrectomy.
Meeks JJ; Zhao LC; Navai N; Perry KT; Nadler RB; Smith ND
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2375-8. PubMed ID: 18930268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.
Gill IS; Matin SF; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Steinberg A; Mascha E; Thornton J; Sherief MH; Strzempkowski B; Novick AC
J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 12796646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic partial nephrectomy in the setting of prior abdominal surgery.
Petros FG; Patel MN; Kheterpal E; Siddiqui S; Ross J; Bhandari A; Diaz M; Menon M; Rogers CG
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21176077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
