453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26377663)
1. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrative framework for 3D cobb angle measurement on CT images.
Huo X; Tan JQ; Qian J; Cheng L; Jing JH; Shao K; Li BN
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Mar; 82():111-118. PubMed ID: 28183004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Lee TT; Lai KK; Cheng JC; Castelein RM; Lam TP; Zheng YP
J Orthop Translat; 2021 Jul; 29():51-59. PubMed ID: 34094858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis.
Loder RT; Urquhart A; Steen H; Graziano G; Hensinger RN; Schlesinger A; Schork MA; Shyr Y
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):768-70. PubMed ID: 7559707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools.
Wu W; Liang J; Du Y; Tan X; Xiang X; Wang W; Ru N; Le J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 24502397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.
Loder RT; Spiegel D; Gutknecht S; Kleist K; Ly T; Mehbod A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2548-53. PubMed ID: 15543072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
