129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26377889)
1. Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors.
Tijmstra J; Hoijtink H; Sijtsma K
Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):880-96. PubMed ID: 26377889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models.
Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):846-869. PubMed ID: 30793230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing manifest monotonicity using order-constrained statistical inference.
Tijmstra J; Hessen DJ; van der Heijden PG; Sijtsma K
Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 25107519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
Fox JP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.
Fox JP; Mulder J; Sinharay S
Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):979-1006. PubMed ID: 28852944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A note on monotonicity of item response functions for ordered polytomous item response theory models.
Kang HA; Su YH; Chang HH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):523-535. PubMed ID: 29516492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha to evaluate informative hypotheses.
Okada K
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):333-46. PubMed ID: 26123160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data.
Jin IH; Jeon M
Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):236-260. PubMed ID: 29987708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA-GAMMA Data Augmentation.
Balamuta JJ; Culpepper SA
Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):903-945. PubMed ID: 35023017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
Sinharay S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive diagnostic assessment via Bayesian evaluation of informative diagnostic hypotheses.
Hoijtink H; Béland S; Vermeulen JA
Psychol Methods; 2014 Mar; 19(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 24127988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Gibbs Sampler for the (Extended) Marginal Rasch Model.
Maris G; Bechger T; San Martin E
Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):859-79. PubMed ID: 26493183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: matching measurement models to latent structure.
Ruscio J; Ruscio AM
Assessment; 2002 Mar; 9(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 11911233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stochastic search item selection for factor analytic models.
Mavridis D; Ntzoufras I
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):284-303. PubMed ID: 23837882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Latent class models for testing monotonicity and invariant item ordering for polytomous items.
Ligtvoet R; Vermunt JK
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):237-50. PubMed ID: 21651508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. All for one or some for all? Evaluating informative hypotheses using multiple N = 1 studies.
Klaassen F; Zedelius CM; Veling H; Aarts H; Hoijtink H
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2276-2291. PubMed ID: 29247386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
