200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26378805)
1. Monte Carlo comparison of x-ray and proton CT for range calculations of proton therapy beams.
Arbor N; Dauvergne D; Dedes G; Létang JM; Parodi K; Quiñones CT; Testa E; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7585-99. PubMed ID: 26378805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regularised patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on proton radiographic images.
Krah N; Patera V; Rit S; Schiavi A; Rinaldi I
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065008. PubMed ID: 30708365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre-treatment patient-specific stopping power by combining list-mode proton radiography and x-ray CT.
Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Hansen DC; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6836-6852. PubMed ID: 28657550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Niepel K; Wesp P; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Bashkirov V; Rit S; Volz L; Schulte RW; Landry G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165002. PubMed ID: 31220814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved calibration of mass stopping power in low density tissue for a proton pencil beam algorithm.
Warren DR; Partridge M; Hill MA; Peach K
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4243-61. PubMed ID: 25973866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning.
van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F
Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic lung phantom commissioning for 4D dose assessment in proton therapy.
Kostiukhina N; Palmans H; Stock M; Georg D; Knäusl B
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(23):235001. PubMed ID: 31652424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the proton range accuracy and optimization of CT calibration curves utilizing range probing.
Meijers A; Free J; Wagenaar D; Deffet S; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):03NT02. PubMed ID: 31896099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined influence of CT random noise and HU-RSP calibration curve nonlinearities on proton range systematic errors.
Brousmiche S; Souris K; de Xivry JO; Lee JA; Macq B; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8226-8245. PubMed ID: 28817383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
