These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26378833)

  • 1. Public Health and Legal Arguments in Favor of a Policy to Cap the Portion Sizes of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.
    Roberto CA; Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2015 Nov; 105(11):2183-90. PubMed ID: 26378833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. News Media Framing of New York City's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion-Size Cap.
    Donaldson EA; Cohen JE; Truant PL; Rutkow L; Kanarek NF; Barry CL
    Am J Public Health; 2015 Nov; 105(11):2202-9. PubMed ID: 26378853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demographic Groups Likely Affected by Regulating Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion Sizes.
    Smith NR; Grummon AH; Frerichs LM
    Am J Prev Med; 2020 Sep; 59(3):e135-e139. PubMed ID: 32576417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Same strategy different industry: corporate influence on public policy.
    Shelley D; Ogedegbe G; Elbel B
    Am J Public Health; 2014 Apr; 104(4):e9-e11. PubMed ID: 24524535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interplay of public health law and industry self-regulation: the case of sugar-sweetened beverage sales in schools.
    Mello MM; Pomeranz J; Moran P
    Am J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 98(4):595-604. PubMed ID: 17901427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-sized soda ban as an alternative to soda tax.
    Min HM
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2013; 23(1):187-232. PubMed ID: 25330566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Pricing Policies: Simulation of Minimum Price Laws and Taxes in New York City.
    Grummon AH; Golden SD
    Am J Prev Med; 2022 Mar; 62(3):e159-e168. PubMed ID: 34782187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caloric effect of a 16-ounce (473-mL) portion-size cap on sugar-sweetened beverages served in restaurants.
    Wang YC; Vine SM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2013 Aug; 98(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 23761485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of school district policy change on consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among high school students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004-2006.
    Cradock AL; McHugh A; Mont-Ferguson H; Grant L; Barrett JL; Wang YC; Gortmaker SL
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2011 Jul; 8(4):A74. PubMed ID: 21672398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced policy options to regulate sugar-sweetened beverages to support public health.
    Pomeranz JL
    J Public Health Policy; 2012 Feb; 33(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 21866177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
    Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
    JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 31087022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The historic role of boards of health in local innovation: New York City's soda portion case.
    Gostin LO; Reeve BH; Ashe M
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(15):1511-2. PubMed ID: 25222190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sweetened and unsweetened non-alcoholic beverages in New Zealand: assessment of relative availability, price, serve size, and sugar content.
    Ni Mhurchu C; Eyles Hi
    Pac Health Dialog; 2014 Mar; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25928997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sugar sweetened beverages on emerging outdoor advertising in New York City.
    Basch CH; LeBlanc M; Ethan D; Basch CE
    Public Health; 2019 Feb; 167():38-40. PubMed ID: 30616032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Public Testimony About Philadelphia's Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Elstein JG; Lowery CM; Sangoi P; Peterhans A; Bleich SN; Lawman HG; Roberto CA
    Am J Prev Med; 2022 Mar; 62(3):e178-e187. PubMed ID: 34753646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating equity critiques in food policy: the case of sugar-sweetened beverages.
    Barnhill A; King KF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 23581672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Innovative policies under Bloomberg's 'New' Public Health.
    Borden DP
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 24408589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
    Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
    JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 32930704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State Preemption of Consumer Merchandise and Beverage Containers: New Strategy to Preempt Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Policies?
    Pomeranz JL; Mozaffarian D
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2022 May-Jun 01; 28(3):222-232. PubMed ID: 35045010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychologically Informed Implementations of Sugary-Drink Portion Limits.
    John LK; Donnelly GE; Roberto CA
    Psychol Sci; 2017 May; 28(5):620-629. PubMed ID: 28362567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.