346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26378925)
1. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance.
Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J
Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mapping visuospatial attention: the greyscales task in combination with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Giglhuber K; Maurer S; Zimmer C; Meyer B; Krieg SM
BMC Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 29996777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
Striemer CL; Russell K; Nath P
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27206500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
McCourt ME; Jewell G
Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage.
Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Corben L; Slavin MJ; Nicholls ME; Bradshaw JL
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 14670577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visuospatial processing in schizophrenia: does it share common mechanisms with pseudoneglect?
Cavézian C; Michel C; Rossetti Y; Danckert J; d'Amato T; Saoud M
Laterality; 2011 Jul; 16(4):433-61. PubMed ID: 22304235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
