These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26378925)

  • 21. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When the whole is more than the sum of the parts: evidence from visuospatial neglect.
    Gallace A; Imbornone E; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 2(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 19824178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developmental trajectory of pseudoneglect in adults using the greyscales task.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1937-1943. PubMed ID: 27598252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The orienting response drives pseudoneglect-Evidence from an objective pupillometric method.
    Strauch C; Romein C; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S; Ten Brink AF
    Cortex; 2022 Jun; 151():259-271. PubMed ID: 35462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.
    Valadao DF; Hurwitz M; Danckert J
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 207(3-4):157-64. PubMed ID: 20953590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Orr CA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME; Shpaner M; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16418850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right?
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?
    Michel C; Bidot S; Bonnetblanc F; Quercia P
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 21164370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lost in the middle. Attentional modulation of the pseudoneglect phenomenon in a "no hands" line bisection paradigm.
    Lavanchy L; Mayer E; Hauert CA
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):181-2. PubMed ID: 15174463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.
    Shah-Basak PP; Chen P; Caulfield K; Medina J; Hamilton RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():6-13. PubMed ID: 29578025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.