These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26378925)

  • 41. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Residual perceptual distortion in 'recovered' hemispatial neglect.
    Harvey M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 10390036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?
    Nicholls ME; Roberts GR
    Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study.
    Learmonth G; Benwell CSY; Thut G; Harvey M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():139-151. PubMed ID: 28343987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect.
    Mitchell AG; Kandt PO; McIntosh RD
    Laterality; 2022 Jul; 27(4):443-466. PubMed ID: 35940957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Right fronto-parietal dysfunction underlying spatial attention in bipolar disorder.
    Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 23916624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improved Accuracy on Lateralized Spatial Judgments in Healthy Aging.
    Williamson JB; Murphy A; Lamb DG; Schwartz Z; Szeles D; Harciarek M; Mańkowska A; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Nov; 25(10):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 31543083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Chen J; Niemeier M
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Dec; 232(12):4001-19. PubMed ID: 25200174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Dec; 28(4):436-452. PubMed ID: 30460436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mapping the anatomy of perceptual pseudoneglect. A multivariate approach.
    Chen J; Lee ACH; O'Neil EB; Abdul-Nabi M; Niemeier M
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 207():116402. PubMed ID: 31783115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory.
    Michel C; Pisella L; Halligan PW; Luauté J; Rode G; Boisson D; Rossetti Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 12427563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness.
    Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task.
    Nicholls ME; Hobson A; Petty J; Churches O; Thomas NA
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():134-143. PubMed ID: 27923149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.