These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26379569)

  • 1. Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 × 2 tables.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1186. PubMed ID: 26379569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Wiesner P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():750. PubMed ID: 32528335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables.
    Bruckmaier G; Binder K; Krauss S; Kufner HM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():632. PubMed ID: 31156488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G; Marienhagen J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0195029. PubMed ID: 29584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How general is the natural frequency effect? The case of joint probabilities.
    Stegmüller N; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1296359. PubMed ID: 38659687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different Visualizations Cause Different Strategies When Dealing With Bayesian Situations.
    Eichler A; Böcherer-Linder K; Vogel M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1897. PubMed ID: 32973606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Visualizing Nested Sets. An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and Unit Squares.
    Böcherer-Linder K; Eichler A
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2026. PubMed ID: 28123371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations.
    Böcherer-Linder K; Eichler A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():267. PubMed ID: 30873061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Use of Visualizations to Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Literature Review.
    Cui L; Lo S; Liu Z
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36977297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.
    Hoffrage U; Krauss S; Martignon L; Gigerenzer G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1473. PubMed ID: 26528197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring people's covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations.
    Steib N; Krauss S; Binder K; Büchter T; Böcherer-Linder K; Eichler A; Vogel M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1184370. PubMed ID: 37908812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Effect of Visualizations on Bayesian Reasoning through Crowdsourcing.
    Micallef L; Dragicevic P; Fekete J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Dec; 18(12):2536-45. PubMed ID: 26357162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User testing of an adaptation of fishbone diagrams to depict results of systematic reviews.
    Gartlehner G; Schultes MT; Titscher V; Morgan LC; Bobashev GV; Williams P; West SL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 29233133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boosting for insight and/or boosting for agency? How to maximize accurate test interpretation with natural frequencies.
    Feufel MA; Keller N; Kendel F; Spies CD
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 36747214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teaching Bayesian reasoning: an evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical students.
    Kurzenhäuser S; Hoffrage U
    Med Teach; 2002 Sep; 24(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 12450472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.