213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26379610)
1. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Back to the future: asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions.
Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
J Psychol; 2013; 147(6):619-40. PubMed ID: 24199515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observers' performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines.
Caso L; Palena N; Vrij A; Gnisci A
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31984097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Liu-Jönsson M
Psych J; 2013 Dec; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26271363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
