These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26379956)

  • 21. Comparison of short- and medium-term clinical outcomes between transradial approach and transfemoral approach in a high-volume PCI heart center in China.
    He P; Yang Y; Qiao S; Xu B; Yao M; Wu Y; Yuan J; Chen J; Liu H; Dai J; Yang X; Tang X; Wang Y; Li W; Gao R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118491. PubMed ID: 25826213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radial vs. Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Malik AH; Yandrapalli S; Shetty SS; Zaid S; Athar A; Aronow WS; Timmermans RJ; Ahmad H; Cooper HA; Naidu SS; Panza JA
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 Jul; 28():57-64. PubMed ID: 32981856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adverse In-Hospital Outcome of Transradial PCI in Comparison to Transfemoral PCI in NSTEMI Patients during Index Hospitalization: A Single Center Study in Bangladesh.
    Huq AM; Uddin MJ; Momen A; Karmakar PK; Hashem S; Rahman MA; Alam I; Imam JT; Miah M; Rahman A; Ghosh TP
    Mymensingh Med J; 2022 Apr; 31(2):400-405. PubMed ID: 35383757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.
    Schernthaner C; Hammerer M; Harb S; Heigert M; Hoellinger K; Lassnig E; Maurer E; Schuler J; Siostrzonek P; Ulmer H; Winter A; Altenberger J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2018 Mar; 130(5-6):182-189. PubMed ID: 28900715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved outcomes from transradial over transfemoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and upstream use of tirofiban.
    Zhang Q; Qiu JP; Zhang RY; Hu J; Yang ZK; Ding FH; DU R; Zhu TQ; Zhang JS; Shen WF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1063-8. PubMed ID: 23506579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.
    Huyut MA; Yamaç AH
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2018 May; 19(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 29724974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radial vs Femoral Access in ACS Patients Undergoing Complex PCI Is Associated With Consistent Bleeding Benefit and No Excess of Risks.
    Landi A; Branca M; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Heg D; Calabro P; Esposito G; Sardella G; Tumscitz C; Garducci S; Andò G; Limbruno U; Sganzerla P; Santarelli A; Briguori C; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Pedrazzini G; Windecker S; Valgimigli M;
    Can J Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 38(10):1488-1500. PubMed ID: 35753631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: insight from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry.
    Yamashita Y; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Yaku H; Kaji S; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Ando K; Kadota K; Abe M; Akao M; Nagao K; Shizuta S; Ono K; Kimura T;
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 28698995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis.
    Osman M; Saleem M; Osman K; Kheiri B; Regner S; Radaideh Q; Moreland JA; Rao SV; Kapadia S
    Am Heart J; 2020 Jun; 224():98-104. PubMed ID: 32361279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Emerging evidence that radial is safer than femoral percutaneous coronary intervention in subjects with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Scalone G; Burzotta F; Aurigemma C; Pirozzolo G; Trani C
    Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2013 Jun; 8(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 23863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Yan ZX; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Liu YY; Shi DM; Guo YH; Cheng WJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 May; 121(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 18701040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of vascular approach (transradial vs. transfemoral) on the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction patients.
    Sciahbasi A; Burzotta F; Rigattieri S; Pendenza G; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Loschiavo P; Penco M; Lioy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 22226170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transradial versus transfemoral intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in Korean population.
    Li H; Rha SW; Choi BG; Shim MS; Choi SY; Choi CU; Kim EJ; Oh DJ; Cho BR; Kim MH; Kim DI; Jeong MH; Yoo SY; Jeong SS; Kim BO; Hyun MS; Youn YJ; Yoon J
    Korean J Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 33(4):716-726. PubMed ID: 28859467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transradial Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kedev S
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2015 Apr; 4(2):167-177. PubMed ID: 28582048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term clinical outcomes in transradial versus transfemoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Gao L; Gao Z; Song Y; Guan C; Xu B; Chen J; Liu H; Qin X; Yao M; Yuan J; Wu Y; Hu F; Qian J; Dou K; Yang W; Qiu H; Mu C; Dai J; Zhang P; Qiao SB; Chen J; Gao R; Yang Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97 Suppl 2():1009-1015. PubMed ID: 33689212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variation in the Adoption of Transradial Access for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the NCDR CathPCI Registry.
    Valle JA; Kaltenbach LA; Bradley SM; Yeh RW; Rao SV; Gurm HS; Armstrong EJ; Messenger JC; Waldo SW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2242-2254. PubMed ID: 29102582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Zhang Q; Zhang RY; Qiu JP; Zhang JF; Wang XL; Jiang L; Liao ML; Zhang JS; Hu J; Yang ZK; Shen WF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Mar; 121(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 18364130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thrombolysis Followed by Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Artery Approach in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.
    Wang YB; Fu XH; Gu XS; Geng W; Zhao YJ; Hao GZ; Jiang YF; Li SQ; Fan WZ
    Acta Cardiol Sin; 2014 Jul; 30(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 27122801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
    Ye Y; Zeng Y
    Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.